Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22227021›Full record

ArticleGenomics2012

GenRev: exploring functional relevance of genes in molecular networks.

Siyuan Zheng, Zhongming Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Siyuan ZhengDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Zhongming Zhao

Funding

Iron and Mitochondrial Genomics in Neuro-inflammation and HAND: A CHARTER StudyR01MH095621 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI HULGAN, TODD M, KALLIANPUR, ASHA R · 2011 to 2015
$3.1M
Understanding Genetic Basis of Dental Caries via Integrative Genomic ApproachesR03DE022093 · NIDCR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, LILY, ZHAO, ZHONGMING · 2011 to 2012
$478k
NIDCR NIH HHS R03 DE022093NIDCR NIH HHS R03DE022093NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce GenRev, a network-based software package developed to explore the functional relevance of genes generated as an intermediate result from numerous high-throughput technologies. GenRev searches for optimal intermediate nodes (genes) for the connection of input nodes via several algorithms, including the Klein-Ravi algorithm, the limited kWalks algorithm and a heuristic local search algorithm. Gene ranking and graph clustering analyses are integrated into the package. GenRev has the following features. (1) It provides users with great flexibility to define their own networks. (2) Users are allowed to define each gene's importance in a subnetwork search by setting its score. (3) It is standalone and platform independent. (4) It provides an optimization in subnetwork search, which dramatically reduces the running time. GenRev is particularly designed for general use so that users have the flexibility to choose a reference network and define the score of genes. GenRev is freely available at http://bioinfo.mc.vanderbilt.edu/GenRev.html.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysSoftwareAlgorithmsComputational BiologyProtein Interaction Mapping

Identifiers

PMID22227021
PMCPMC3292679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.