Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22226962›Full record

ArticleBiochemical and biophysical research communications2012

Characterization of germline antibody libraries from human umbilical cord blood and selection of monoclonal antibodies to viral envelope glycoproteins: Implications for mechanisms of immune evasion and design of vaccine immunogens.

Weizao Chen, Emily D Streaker, Daniel E Russ, Yang Feng, Ponraj Prabakaran, Dimiter S Dimitrov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Phages and HIV-1: from display to interplay.International journal of molecular sciences · 2012
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Weizao ChenProtein Interactions Group, Center for Cancer Research Nanobiology Program, National Cancer Institute-Frederick, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
Emily D Streaker
Daniel E Russ
Yang Feng
Ponraj Prabakaran
Dimiter S Dimitrov
National Institutes of Health · USCenter for Information Technology · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · US

Funding

Antibody-based therapeutics and vaccines against AIDSZIABC011155 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI DIMITROV, DIMITER S · 2009 to 2017
$2.6M
Antibody therapeutics against biodefense-related diseasesZIABC011156 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI DIMITROV, DIMITER S · 2009 to 2017
$2.4M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011155NCI NIH HHS N01 CO012400NCI NIH HHS N01-CO-12400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have previously observed that all known HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) are highly divergent from germline antibodies in contrast to bnAbs against Hendra virus, Nipah virus and SARS coronavirus (SARS CoV). We have hypothesized that because the germline antibodies are so different from the mature HIV-1-specific bnAbs they may not bind the epitopes of the mature antibodies and provided the first evidence to support this hypothesis by using individual putative germline-like predecessor antibodies. To further validate the hypothesis and understand initial immune responses to different viruses, two phage-displayed human cord blood-derived IgM libraries were constructed which contained mostly germline antibodies or antibodies with very low level of somatic hypermutations. They were panned against different HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins (Envs), SARS CoV protein receptor-binding domain (RBD), and soluble Hendra virus G protein (sG). Despite a high sequence and combinatorial diversity observed in the cord blood-derived IgM antibody repertoire, no enrichment for binders of Envs was observed in contrast to considerable specific enrichments produced with panning against RBD and sG; one of the selected monoclonal antibodies (against the RBD) was of high (nM) affinity with only few somatic mutations. These results further support and expand our initial hypothesis for fundamental differences in immune responses leading to elicitation of bnAbs against HIV-1 compared to SARS CoV and Hendra virus. HIV-1 uses a strategy to minimize or eliminate strong binding of germline antibodies to its Env; in contrast, SARS CoV and Hendra virus, and perhaps other viruses causing acute infections, can bind germline antibody or minimally somatically mutated antibodies with relatively high affinity which could be one of the reasons for the success of sG and RBD as vaccine immunogens.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAmino Acid SequenceAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingFetal BloodGlycoproteinsHendra VirusHIV-1HumansMolecular Sequence DataPeptide LibraryProtein Structure, TertiarySevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusViral Envelope ProteinsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingGlycoproteinsPeptide LibraryViral Envelope Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22226962
PMCPMC3268823
OpenAlexW2093985842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.