ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2011
Intensive control of diabetes in the hospital: why, how, and what is in the future?
Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of diabetes by a healthcare team in a cardiology unit: a randomized controlled trial.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2013Trial
- A two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis investigates associations between gut microbiota and type 2 diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Where to Initiate Basal Insulin Therapy: Inpatient or Outpatient Department? Real-World Observation in China.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2022Article
- Electronic health records and the evolution of diabetes care: a narrative review.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2015Review
- Caring Behaviors: Perceptions of Acute Care Nurses and Hospitalized Patients with Diabetes.Journal of patient experience · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intensive management of diabetes is identified as a critical component of inpatient care. However, the fundamental question that remains is whether controlling glycemia in noncritically ill diabetes patients at the lower end of the current guidelines improves outcomes of hospitalization, long-term outcomes of the primary condition, and long-term outcomes of diabetes compared with average glycemia greater than 180 mg/dl. A group of clinical investigators--Planning Research in Inpatient Diabetes (PRIDE)--is preparing randomized controlled trials with the hope of defining optimal glycemic targets for hospitalized patients with diabetes. Given the variety of clinical situations that can occur in the inpatient setting, many medical centers have established dedicated inpatient diabetes teams. There is ample evidence, albeit retrospective, that these teams improve inpatient glucose control and reduce lengths of hospital stays. Using hospitalization as an opportunity to educate patients about diabetes and to optimize their treatment regimen may improve long-term outpatient glycemic control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.