Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22226261›Full record

Trial reportJournal of diabetes science and technology2011

Hemoglobin A1c testing in an emergency department.

Michelle F Magee, Carine Nassar

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02269098 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

The Synergy to Control Emergency Department Hyperglycemia Program for Type 2 Diabetes: STEP-Diabetes.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedstar Health Research InstituteRan2012 to 2013Enrolled101ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Medication Adherence, HYPERGLYCEMIAArmsDiabetes medication management
NCT06899191 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Diabetes Electronic Prompt for Improved Care Coordination and Treatment (DEPICCT) in the ED

TypeinterventionalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2025 to 2026Enrolled300ConditionsType 2 Diabetes, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), Hyperglycemia, Insulin Dependent DiabetesArmsHemoglobin A1c, Observation Unit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. How Can Point-of-Care Technologies Support In-Hospital Diabetes Care?Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Significance of HbA1c and its measurement in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: US experience.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle F MageeMedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland 20010, USA. michelle.f.magee@medstar.net
Carine Nassar
Georgetown University · USMedStar Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency department (ED) visits for hyperglycemia are common and costly. Enhanced strategies for recognizing and managing patients with diabetes in the ED are needed. Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) testing is typically used to assess level of glycemic control in the 2-3 months preceding an office visit. In this article, we report on potential roles for point-of-care (POC) A1C testing in the ED for patients presenting with uncontrolled hyperglycemia.

methodsWe enrolled patients presenting to an urban tertiary care hospital ED with blood glucose (BG) ≥ 200 mg/dl who were otherwise stable for discharge (n = 86) in a prospective, nonrandomized pilot study. Antihyperglycemic medication management, survival-skills diabetes self-management education, and health system navigation were provided. Followup visits took place at 24-72 hours and at 2 and 4 weeks. Point-of-care A1C testing was performed at baseline and at 2 weeks. Baseline A1C results were used by the ED physician and the educator to inform the patient of likely preadmission glycemic classification, and the potential role that the (diabetes mellitus) DM medication regimen assigned in the ED had in enabling overall progress in glycemic control at 2 weeks post-ED initiation of treatment.

resultsAt baseline, 50% of POC A1C values were >13%. Mean BG fell from 356 ± 110 mg/dl to 183 ± 103 mg/dl at 4 weeks (average decrease of 173.5 g/dl, p < 0.001). Mean A1C fell by 0.4%, from 12.0 ± 1.5% to 11.6 ± 1.6% at 2 weeks, p = 0.048. There were zero instances of day 1 hypoglycemia and overall hypoglycemia rates were low (1.3%).

conclusionsPoint-of-care A1C testing in the ED helped inform both the provider and the patient of likely prior glycemic status, including unrecognized or uncontrolled type 2 diabetes, and allowed emphasis of the importance of timely diabetes self-management education and medication management in preventing acute and chronic complications. Followup POC A1C testing at 2 weeks was used to confirm early improvement in glycemic control postintervention.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPoint-of-Care SystemsAdultAgedAlgorithmsBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID22226261
PMCPMC3262710
OpenAlexW2069402936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.