ArticleBMC bioinformatics2012
A comparison study on feature selection of DNA structural properties for promoter prediction.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distinctive physical properties of DNA shared by RNA polymerase II gene promoters and 5'-flanking regions of tRNA genes.Journal of biochemistry · 2024Article
- Physical Peculiarity of Two Sites in Human Promoters: Universality and Diverse Usage in Gene Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- On the use of QDE-SVM for gene feature selection and cell type classification from scRNA-seq data.PloS one · 2023Article
- DeepTSS: multi-branch convolutional neural network for transcription start site identification from CAGE data.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Genome-Wide Prediction of Transcription Start Sites in Conifers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Feature selection revisited in the single-cell era.Genome biology · 2021Review
- DIANA-miRGen v4: indexing promoters and regulators for more than 1500 microRNAs.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- iPro70-FMWin: identifying Sigma70 promoters using multiple windowing and minimal features.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2019Article
- Article
- The impact of sequence length and number of sequences on promoter prediction performance.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Assessing the effects of data selection and representation on the development of reliable E. coli sigma 70 promoter region predictors.PloS one · 2015Article
- Rule-based knowledge acquisition method for promoter prediction in human and Drosophila species.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2014Article
- A composite method based on formal grammar and DNA structural features in detecting human polymerase II promoter region.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPromoter prediction is an integrant step for understanding gene regulation and annotating genomes. Traditional promoter analysis is mainly based on sequence compositional features. Recently, many kinds of structural features have been employed in promoter prediction. However, considering the high-dimensionality and overfitting problems, it is unfeasible to utilize all available features for promoter prediction. Thus it is necessary to choose some appropriate features for the prediction task.
resultsThis paper conducts an extensive comparison study on feature selection of DNA structural properties for promoter prediction. Firstly, to examine whether promoters possess some special structures, we carry out a systematical comparison among the profiles of thirteen structural features on promoter and non-promoter sequences. Secondly, we investigate the correlations between these structural features and promoter sequences. Thirdly, both filter and wrapper methods are utilized to select appropriate feature subsets from thirteen different kinds of structural features for promoter prediction, and the predictive power of the selected feature subsets is evaluated. Finally, we compare the prediction performance of the feature subsets selected in this paper with nine existing promoter prediction approaches.
conclusionsExperimental results show that the structural features are differentially correlated to promoters. Specifically, DNA-bending stiffness, DNA denaturation and energy-related features are highly correlated with promoters. The predictive power for promoter sequences differentiates greatly among different structural features. Selecting the relevant features can significantly improve the accuracy of promoter prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.