Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22225618›Full record

ArticleVirology journal2012

Antiviral activity of the EB peptide against zoonotic poxviruses.

Sharon E Altmann, Curtis R Brandt, Peter B Jahrling, Joseph E Blaney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. iScience · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Antiviral peptides as promising therapeutic drugs.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019
    Review
  7. Interferon-omega: Current status in clinical applications.International immunopharmacology · 2017
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sharon E AltmannEmerging Viral Pathogens Section, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. altmannse@niaid.nih.gov
Curtis R Brandt
Peter B Jahrling
Joseph E Blaney
National Institutes of Health · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Pathogenesis and countermeasures of poxviruses, hemorrhagic fever viruses, MERSZIAAI001025 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI JOHNSON, REED · 2009 to 2018
$14.1M
UW Vision Research Core - Administrative CoreP30EY016665 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AKIHIRO IKEDA · 2005 to 2026
$12.6M
PEPTIDE INHIBITORS OF PAPILLOMAVIRAL INFECTIONP01AI052049 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI BRANDT, CURTIS R · 2001 to 2004
$3.5M
Intramural NIH HHSNEI NIH HHS P30 EY016665NIAID NIH HHS AI52049PHS HHS EYP30-016665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe EB peptide is a 20-mer that was previously shown to have broad spectrum in vitro activity against several unrelated viruses, including highly pathogenic avian influenza, herpes simplex virus type I, and vaccinia, the prototypic orthopoxvirus. To expand on this work, we evaluated EB for in vitro activity against the zoonotic orthopoxviruses cowpox and monkeypox and for in vivo activity in mice against vaccinia and cowpox.

findingsIn yield reduction assays, EB had an EC50 of 26.7 μM against cowpox and 4.4 μM against monkeypox. The EC50 for plaque reduction was 26.3 μM against cowpox and 48.6 μM against monkeypox. A scrambled peptide had no inhibitory activity against either virus. EB inhibited cowpox in vitro by disrupting virus entry, as evidenced by a reduction of the release of virus cores into the cytoplasm. Monkeypox was also inhibited in vitro by EB, but at the attachment stage of infection. EB showed protective activity in mice infected intranasally with vaccinia when co-administered with the virus, but had no effect when administered prophylactically one day prior to infection or therapeutically one day post-infection. EB had no in vivo activity against cowpox in mice.

conclusionsWhile EB did demonstrate some in vivo efficacy against vaccinia in mice, the limited conditions under which it was effective against vaccinia and lack of activity against cowpox suggest EB may be more useful for studying orthopoxvirus entry and attachment in vitro than as a therapeutic against orthopoxviruses in vivo.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiviral AgentsCowpoxCowpox virusDisease Models, AnimalEctromelia virusFibroblast Growth Factor 4HumansMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOligopeptidesSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeVacciniaViral LoadViral Plaque AssayAntiviral AgentsFGF4 protein, humanFibroblast Growth Factor 4Oligopeptides

Identifiers

PMID22225618
PMCPMC3275487
OpenAlexW2151553830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.