Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22223755›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2012

Origins and evolution of microRNA genes in plant species.

Masafumi Nozawa, Sayaka Miura, Masatoshi Nei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed
25.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 252 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Conundrum of XenomiRs and Human Health.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Epigenetics in the modern era of crop improvements.Science China. Life sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Tweaking the Small Non-Coding RNAs to Improve Desirable Traits in Plant.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Masafumi NozawaDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA. nozabey@nibb.ac.jp
Sayaka Miura
Masatoshi Nei
Institut de Biologia Evolutiva · ES

Funding

THEORETICAL POPULATION GENETICS AND ITS APPLICATIONSR01GM020293 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI NEI, MASATOSHI · 1985 to 2009
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM020293NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM020293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are among the most important regulatory elements of gene expression in animals and plants. However, their origin and evolutionary dynamics have not been studied systematically. In this paper, we identified putative miRNA genes in 11 plant species using the bioinformatic technique and examined their evolutionary changes. Our homology search indicated that no miRNA gene is currently shared between green algae and land plants. The number of miRNA genes has increased substantially in the land plant lineage, but after the divergence of eudicots and monocots, the number has changed in a lineage-specific manner. We found that miRNA genes have originated mainly by duplication of preexisting miRNA genes or protein-coding genes. Transposable elements also seem to have contributed to the generation of species-specific miRNA genes. The relative importance of these mechanisms in plants is quite different from that in Drosophila species, where the formation of hairpin structures in the genomes seems to be a major source of miRNA genes. This difference in the origin of miRNA genes between plants and Drosophila may be explained by the difference in the binding to target mRNAs between plants and animals. We also found that young miRNA genes are less conserved than old genes in plants as well as in Drosophila species. Yet, nearly half of the gene families in the ancestor of flowering plants have been lost in at least one species examined. This indicates that the repertoires of miRNA genes have changed more dynamically than previously thought during plant evolution.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularDNA Transposable ElementsGene DuplicationMicroRNAsMultigene FamilyPlantsRNA, PlantDNA Transposable ElementsMicroRNAsRNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID22223755
PMCPMC3318440
OpenAlexW2122910044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.