Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22223661›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Distinct influences of peptide-MHC quality and quantity on in vivo T-cell responses.

Rachel A Gottschalk, Matthew M Hathorn, Hélène Beuneu, Emily Corse, Michael L Dustin, Grégoire Altan-Bonnet, James P Allison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Proofreading and single-molecule sensitivity in T cell receptor signaling by condensate nucleation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. T-cell virtuosity in ''knowing thyself".Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  11. Antigen perception in T cells by long-term Erk and NFAT signaling dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. What's the Catch? The Significance of Catch Bonds in T Cell Activation.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. TCR Recognition of Peptide-MHC-I: Rule Makers and Breakers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  20. Relationship of 2D Affinity to T Cell Functional Outcomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachel A GottschalkDepartment of Immunology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and Ludwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Matthew M Hathorn
Hélène Beuneu
Emily Corse
Michael L Dustin
Grégoire Altan-Bonnet
James P Allison

Funding

Quantitative modeling of the phenotypic variability of individual T cells and theR01AI083408 · NIAID · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI ALTAN-BONNET, GREGOIRE · 2009 to 2012
$1.9M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI083408NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI083408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The strength of T-cell receptor (TCR) stimulation and subsequent T-cell response depend on a combination of peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) density and potency. By comparing two different pMHC at doses yielding similar proliferation in vivo, we have highlighted unexpected differences in the qualitative and quantitative effects of TCR ligand. Measurements of cytokine sensitivity and two-photon imaging of T cell-dendritic cell (T-DC) interactions reveal discrimination between comparably weak stimuli resulting from either decreased pMHC potency or pMHC density. In addition, TCR-induced genes in broad gene expression profiles segregate into two groups: one that responds to cumulative TCR signal and another that responds to pMHC quality, independent of quantity. These observations suggest that models of TCR ligand discrimination must account for disparate sensitivity of downstream responses to specific influences of pMHC potency.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CommunicationCell ProliferationDendritic CellsGene Expression RegulationHistocompatibility AntigensInterleukin-2MaleMicePeptidesReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Interleukin-2Signal TransductionT-LymphocytesHistocompatibility AntigensInterleukin-2PeptidesReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Interleukin-2

Identifiers

PMID22223661
PMCPMC3271915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.