Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22221483›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation2012

Discussions of the kidney disease trajectory by elderly patients and nephrologists: a qualitative study.

Jane O Schell, Uptal D Patel, Karen E Steinhauser, Natalie Ammarell, James A Tulsky

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04466865 (Best Case/Worst Case), which is not on this map. Cited by 113 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04466865 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Best Case/Worst Case: A Multisite Randomized Clinical Trial of Scenario Planning for Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2020 to 2026Enrolled407ConditionsPalliative Care, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Decision Making, Decision Support TechniquesArmsBest Case/Worst Case communication tool training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 249 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Non-medical barriers reported by nephrologists when providing renal replacement therapy or comprehensive conservative management to end-stage kidney disease patients: a systematic review.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Towards the best kidney failure prediction tool: a systematic review and selection aid.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Patient perspectives on informed decision-making surrounding dialysis initiation.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2013
    Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. External validation of a prognostic model in routine practice for short- and long-term survival in peritoneal dialysis.Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jane O SchellDepartment of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC; Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA. jane.schell@duke.edu
Uptal D Patel
Karen E Steinhauser
Natalie Ammarell
James A Tulsky
Duke University · USDurham VA Medical Center · USClinical Research Institute · US

Funding

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH FELLOWSHIPT32HS000079 · AHRQ · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI EDELMAN, DAVID · 1998 to 2013
$1.9M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS000079AHRQ HHS T32 HS00079NIDDK NIH HHS L30 DK089938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElderly patients with advanced kidney disease experience considerable disability, morbidity, and mortality. Little is known about the impact of physician-patient interactions on patient preparation for the illness trajectory. We sought to describe how nephrologists and older patients discuss and understand the prognosis and course of kidney disease leading to renal replacement therapy.

methodsWe conducted focus groups and interviews with 11 nephrologists and 29 patients older than 65 years with advanced chronic kidney disease or receiving hemodialysis. Interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed. We used qualitative analytic methods to identify common and recurrent themes related to the primary research question.

resultsWe identified 6 themes that describe how the kidney disease trajectory is discussed and understood: (1) patients are shocked by their diagnosis, (2) patients are uncertain how their disease will progress, (3) patients lack preparation for living with dialysis, (4) nephrologists struggle to explain illness complexity, (5) nephrologists manage a disease over which they have little control, and (6) nephrologists tend to avoid discussions of the future. Patients and nephrologists acknowledged that prognosis discussions are rare. Patients tended to cope with thoughts of the future through avoidance by focusing on their present clinical status. Nephrologists reported uncertainty and concern for evoking negative reactions as barriers to these conversations.

conclusionsPatients and nephrologists face challenges in understanding and preparing for the kidney disease trajectory. Communication interventions that acknowledge the role of patient emotion and address uncertainty may improve how nephrologists discuss disease trajectory with patients and thereby enhance their understanding and preparation for the future.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionFocus GroupsInterviews as TopicPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunicationEmotionsFemaleHumansKidney DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRenal Dialysis

Identifiers

PMID22221483
PMCPMC3626427
OpenAlexW2065646018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.