Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22221170›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2012

"Add to subtract": a simple method to remove complex background signals from the 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of mixtures.

Tao Ye, Cheng Zheng, Shucha Zhang, G A Nagana Gowda, Olga Vitek, Daniel Raftery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Can NMR solve some significant challenges in metabolomics?Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2015
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tao YeHarvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.
Cheng Zheng
Shucha Zhang
G A Nagana Gowda
Olga Vitek
Daniel Raftery

Funding

Advanced Methods in NMR-Based MetabolomicsR01GM085291 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAFTERY, DANIEL · 2008 to 2016
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085291NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM085291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of its highly reproducible and quantitative nature and minimal requirements for sample preparation or separation, (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is widely used for profiling small-molecule metabolites in biofluids. However (1)H NMR spectra contain many overlapped peaks. In particular, blood serum/plasma and diabetic urine samples contain high concentrations of glucose, which produce strong peaks between 3.2 ppm and 4.0 ppm. Signals from most metabolites in this region are overwhelmed by the glucose background signals and become invisible. We propose a simple "Add to Subtract" background subtraction method and show that it can reduce the glucose signals by 98% to allow retrieval of the hidden information. This procedure includes adding a small drop of concentrated glucose solution to the sample in the NMR tube, mixing, waiting for an equilibration time, and acquisition of a second spectrum. The glucose-free spectra are then generated by spectral subtraction using Bruker Topspin software. Subsequent multivariate statistical analysis can then be used to identify biomarker candidate signals for distinguishing different types of biological samples. The principle of this approach is generally applicable for all quantitative spectral data and should find utility in a variety of NMR-based mixture analyses as well as in metabolite profiling.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBlood Chemical AnalysisGlucoseHumansNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularPrincipal Component AnalysisUrinalysisBiomarkersGlucose

Identifiers

PMID22221170
PMCPMC3282557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.