ArticleClinical drug investigation2012
Diagnosis of depression and use of antidepressant pharmacotherapy among adults in the United States: does a disparity persist by ethnicity/race?
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mendelian Randomization Studies of Major Depressive Disorder, Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Cancers: A PRISMA Review and Meta-Analysis.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2026Pooled it
- A pilot randomized controlled trial of an outreach intervention to improve depression treatment initiation among racial and ethnic groups.General hospital psychiatryTrial
- Mental disorders in the Black population: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Racial, ethnic, and neighborhood disparities in diagnosis of perinatal psychiatric illness.AJOG global reports · 2025Article
- The epidemiology of major depression among adults in Norway: an observational study on the concurrence between population surveys and registry data - a NCDNOR project.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Cross-sectional study of the effects of self-efficacy on fatigue and pain interference in black women with systemic lupus erythematosus: the role of depression, age and education.Lupus science & medicine · 2022Article
- Engagement in perinatal depression treatment: a qualitative study of barriers across and within racial/ethnic groups.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Article
- Observational
- Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura patients' attitudes toward depression management: A qualitative study.Health science reports · 2019Article
- Factors associated with antidepressant use among low-income racially and ethnically diverse patients with type 2 diabetes.Journal of diabetes and its complications · 2019Article
- Article
- Depressive Symptoms Are Associated With Low Treatment Adherence in African American Individuals With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases · 2018Article
- Treatment Initiation for New Episodes of Depression in Primary Care Settings.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Observational
- Clinical versus patient-reported measures of depression in bariatric surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Article
- Racial-Ethnic Differences in Psychiatric Diagnoses and Treatment Across 11 Health Care Systems in the Mental Health Research Network.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2016Article
- Article
- Mental health service use for adult patients with co-occurring depression and physical chronic health care needs, 2007-2010.Medical care · 2015Article
- Racial disparities in total ankle arthroplasty utilization and outcomes.Arthritis research & therapy · 2015Article
- Effects of eliminating drug caps on racial differences in antidepressant use among dual enrollees with diabetes and depression.Clinical therapeutics · 2015Article
- Racial and gender disparities among patients with gout.Current rheumatology reports · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveBoth the rate of diagnosis of depression in the US and the rate of prescribing an antidepressant for its treatment have increased substantially over the past two decades. Previous research has also indicated that the rates of diagnosis and treatment of depression with an antidepressant vary widely by ethnicity/race. The objective of this study was to discern ethnic/race-specific (non-Hispanic Black; Hispanic; non-Hispanic White) population-adjusted rates of US office-based physician-patient encounters (office-based visits) documenting a diagnosis of depression, and the extent of the use of antidepressant pharmacotherapy for its treatment.
methodsData from the US National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) for the years 1992-1997 and 2003-2008 were utilized for this analysis. The years 1998-2002 were excluded due to the magnitude of missing data for the variable ethnicity. The US NAMCS is a national probability sample designed and conducted by the US National Center for Health Statistics of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Depression was defined via International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes 296.2-296.36; 300.4; 311. Antidepressants were defined as US National Drug Code category 0630 prior to 2005, and category 249 in Lexicon Plus® thereafter. Data were partitioned into six 2-year time intervals for trend analysis of population-adjusted rates (per 100) among patients aged 20-79 years. Rates per 2-year time interval are based on US Census Bureau national resident population estimates for the ethnicity/race categories examined. Comparisons within and across time-frames were assessed by chi-squared (χ2) analysis. The a priori level of significance for all statistical tests was set at p < 0.05. Analyses were performed using SAS Release 9.1.3.
resultsOver the 12-year time-frame examined, the rate of office-based visits documenting a diagnosis of depression increased 28.4% for non-Hispanic Whites (from 10.9 to 14.0 per 100; p < 0.001), 54.8% for non-Hispanic Blacks (from 4.2 to 6.5 per 100; p < 0.001), and 37.5% for Hispanics (from 4.8 to 6.6 per 100; p < 0.001). The rate of office-based visits with a recorded diagnosis of depression in concert with the prescribing of an antidepressant increased 66.2% for non-Hispanic Whites (from 6.5 to 10.8 per 100; p < 0.001), 69.2% for non-Hispanic Blacks (from 2.6 to 4.4 per 100; p < 0.001), and 36.7% for Hispanics (from 3.0 to 4.1 per 100; p < 0.001).
conclusionBy 2003-2004, the population-adjusted rates for non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics were similar, and remained so through 2007-2008. However, over the 12-year time-frame examined, the rates for both minority groups were, in each 2-year interval, far less than that observed in non-Hispanic Whites. Disparities remain by ethnicity/race in the diagnosis and treatment of depression in the US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22220929What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.