Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22219722›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2011

The rates of protein synthesis and degradation account for the differential response of neurons to spaced and massed training protocols.

Faisal Naqib, Carole A Farah, Christopher C Pack, Wayne S Sossin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Synapse-specific structural plasticity that protects and refines local circuits during LTP and LTD.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Network motifs exhibiting a differential response to spaced and massed inputs.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  3. The neural substrate of spatial memory stabilization depends on the distribution of the training sessions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  4. The neural circuit linking mushroom body parallel circuits induces memory consolidation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bidirectional regulation of eEF2 phosphorylation controls synaptic plasticity by decoding neuronal activity patterns.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  11. MAPK establishes a molecular context that defines effective training patterns for long-term memory formation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Faisal NaqibDepartment of Physiology, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Carole A Farah
Christopher C Pack
Wayne S Sossin
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CAMcGill University · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP12046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sensory-motor neuron synapse of Aplysia is an excellent model system for investigating the biochemical changes underlying memory formation. In this system, training that is separated by rest periods (spaced training) leads to persistent changes in synaptic strength that depend on biochemical pathways that are different from those that occur when the training lacks rest periods (massed training). Recently, we have shown that in isolated sensory neurons, applications of serotonin, the neurotransmitter implicated in inducing these synaptic changes during memory formation, lead to desensitization of the PKC Apl II response, in a manner that depends on the method of application (spaced versus massed). Here, we develop a mathematical model of this response in order to gain insight into how neurons sense these different training protocols. The model was developed incrementally, and each component was experimentally validated, leading to two novel findings: First, the increased desensitization due to PKA-mediated heterologous desensitization is coupled to a faster recovery than the homologous desensitization that occurs in the absence of PKA activity. Second, the model suggests that increased spacing leads to greater desensitization due to the short half-life of a hypothetical protein, whose production prevents homologous desensitization. Thus, we predict that the effects of differential spacing are largely driven by the rates of production and degradation of proteins. This prediction suggests a powerful mechanism by which information about time is incorporated into neuronal processing.

Indexed as

MemoryAnimalsAplysiaBiochemistryCyclic AMP-Dependent Protein KinasesModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalModels, TheoreticalMotor NeuronsNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsPlasmidsSensory Receptor CellsSynaptic TransmissionCyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases

Identifiers

PMID22219722
PMCPMC3248386
OpenAlexW2018753144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.