Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22219504›Full record

ArticleThe journal of family planning and reproductive health care2012

Cervical screening among migrant women: a qualitative study of Polish, Slovak and Romanian women in London, UK.

Marta Jackowska, Christian von Wagner, Jane Wardle, Dorota Juszczyk, Aleksandra Luszczynska, Jo Waller

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of family planning and reproductive health care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Acceptability of Self-Sampling for Cervical Screening in Ethnically Diverse Groups in Northwest England: A Focus Group Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Central and Eastern European Migrants in the United Kingdom: A Scoping Review of the Reasons for Utilisation of Transnational Healthcare.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The perceptions of general practice among Central and Eastern Europeans in the United Kingdom: A systematic scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  14. Reasons behind Low Cervical Screening Uptake among South Asian Immigrant Women: A Qualitative Exploration.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. COVID-19: information access, trust and adherence to health advice among migrants in Norway.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Experiences of cervical screening participation and non-participation in women from minority ethnic populations in Scotland.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta JackowskaDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, UK.
Christian von Wagner
Jane Wardle
Dorota Juszczyk
Aleksandra Luszczynska
Jo Waller
University College London · GBCancer Research UK · GBUniversity of Colorado Colorado Springs · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14134Cancer Research UK C1418/A9847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore awareness of and participation in cervical screening services in women from Poland, Slovakia and Romania living in London, UK.

methodsThree qualitative studies were carried out in London in 2008-2009: an interview study of professionals working with Central and Eastern European migrants (n=11); a focus group study including three Polish, one Slovak and one Romanian focus group; and an interview study of Polish (n=11), Slovak (n=7) and Romanian (n=2) women.

resultsAwareness of the cervical screening programme was good, but understanding of the purpose of screening was sometimes limited. Some women were fully engaged with the UK screening programme; others used screening both in the UK and their countries of origin; and a third group only had screening in their home countries. Women welcomed the fact that screening is free and that reminders are sent, but some were concerned about the screening interval and the age of the first invitation.

conclusionsMigrant women from Poland, Slovakia and Romania living in London vary in their level of participation in the National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme. More needs to be done to address concerns regarding screening services, and to ensure that language is not a barrier to participation.

Indexed as

AwarenessHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultEurope, EasternFemaleHumansLondonMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal Smears

Identifiers

PMID22219504
PMCPMC3970719
OpenAlexW2106186202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.