ArticleThe Journal of physiology2012
Regulation of fat intake in the absence of flavour signalling.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dietary fat restriction affects brain reward regions in a randomized crossover trial.JCI insight · 2023Trial
- Brain responses to nutrients are severely impaired and not reversed by weight loss in humans with obesity: a randomized crossover study.Nature metabolism · 2023Trial
- Functional segregation of body-brain signals in the area postrema.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Right vagus nerve stimulation promotes motor cortical plasticity.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A lateralized pathway for associating nutrients with flavors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Vagal Sensory Gut-Brain Pathways That Control Eating-Satiety and Beyond.Comprehensive physiology · 2025Review
- Article
- Value-Driven Adaptations of Mesolimbic Dopamine Release Are Governed by Both Model-Based and Model-Free Mechanisms.eNeuro · 2024Article
- Brain dopamine responses to ultra-processed milkshakes are highly variable and not significantly related to adiposity in humans.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Separate gut-brain circuits for fat and sugar reinforcement combine to promote overeating.Cell metabolism · 2024Article
- Standard rodent diets differentially impact alcohol consumption, preference, and gut microbiome diversity.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Reward and inhibition in obesity and cigarette smoking: Neurobiological overlaps and clinical implications.Physiology & behavior · 2023Review
- The impact of caloric availability on eating behavior and ultra-processed food reward.Appetite · 2022Article
- The neural basis of sugar preference.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022Review
- Fat preference deficits and experience-induced recovery in global taste-deficient Trpm5 and Calhm1 knockout mice.Physiology & behavior · 2022Article
- The preference for sugar over sweetener depends on a gut sensor cell.Nature neuroscience · 2022Article
- (Wh)olistic (E)ndocannabinoidome-Microbiome-Axis Modulation through (N)utrition (WHEN) to Curb Obesity and Related Disorders.Lipids in health and disease · 2022Review
- Neural Vulnerability Factors That Predict Future Weight Gain.Current obesity reports · 2021Review
- Post-oral sensing of fat increases food intake and attenuates body weight defense.Cell reports · 2021Article
- Learning of food preferences: mechanisms and implications for obesity & metabolic diseases.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2021Review
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Animals, including humans, can achieve precise regulation of caloric intake by adjusting consumption in response to covert changes in energy density. It remains unknown, however, whether the presence of flavour cues are required for the ability to maintain constant caloric intake. Also unknown are the brain circuits that may function as the central calorie monitors that control adaptive adjustments in energy intake. Here we show that mice trained to lick a dry spout in order to receive intra-gastric infusions of a fat emulsion maintained constant hourly caloric intake by adjusting the number of dry licks in response to changes in caloric density. Animals also increased dry licking according to hunger levels, and developed conditioned preferences for dry sippers associated with high calorie infusions. Importantly, striatal dopamine levels were closely associated with the amount of calories ingested, rather than with the number of dry licks produced. Dopamine levels in dorsal and ventral striatum also reflected caloric density in mice passively receiving intra-gastric infusions of fat emulsions. Consistent with the above, systemic administration of the dopamine receptor blocker haloperidol markedly increased the production of dry licks needed to obtain high-calorie infusions, as if the caloric density of the infusions had been diluted. Conversely, haloperidol markedly decreased the production of dry licks needed to obtain low-calorie infusions. Taken together, our results support the proposition that brain dopamine circuits function as one central sensor of calorie ingestion, since (1) extracellular striatal dopamine levels fluctuate in proportion to the caloric density of nutrients infused in the gut; and (2) inhibiting dopamine receptor signalling disrupts the animals' ability to maintain constant caloric intake across experimental sessions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.