ArticleJournal of neurology2012
Different independent susceptibility markers for first-ever cerebral infarction and myocardial infarction in young patients.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Thrombomodulin and High-Sensitive C-Reactive Protein Levels in Blood Correlate with the Development of Cerebral Infarction Among Asians.Molecular neurobiology · 2016Pooled it
- New strategy for clinical etiologic diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke and blood biomarker discovery based on machine learning.RSC advances · 2022Article
- A clinical method for mapping and quantifying blood stasis in the left ventricle.Journal of biomechanics · 2016Article
- Effects of Opium Addiction and Cigarette Smoking on Hematological Parameters.Addiction & health · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral infarction (CI) and myocardial infarction (MI) share some common features, but there are other differences in risk factors. The aim of our study is to determine whether there are some significantly independent susceptibility markers for them. All consecutive patients between the ages of 18 and 45 years with first-ever CI and MI during 2001-2010 were recruited to participate in the study. Using multivariate logistic regression modeling, we explore many different data, such as age at onset, sex ratio, numbers of patients with history of hypertension, smoking, drinking, and serum lipid, uric acid, prealbumin (PA), and white blood cell (WBC) count levels. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders confirmed the following independent susceptibility markers for young CI patients: hypertension, admission serum PA levels, daily alcohol [odds ratio (OR), 0.251; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.097-0.648, p = 0.004; OR, 0.994; 95% CI, 0.988-0.999, p = 0.031; OR, 0.150; 95% CI, 0.047-0.473, p = 0.001], and for MI patients: age at onset, current smoking, serum WBC, and glucose levels (OR, 1.293; 95% CI, 1.146-1.457, p = 0.000; OR, 8.914; 95% CI, 3.575-22.231, p = 0.000; OR, 1.344; 95% CI, 1.169-1.544, p = 0.000; OR, 1.149; 95% CI, 1.022-1.291, p = 0.020). We conclude that there are some significantly different independent susceptibility markers for young CI and MI patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22218649What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.