Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22218281›Full record

GuidelineNeurology2012

Evidence-based guideline: Antiepileptic drug selection for people with HIV/AIDS: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Ad Hoc Task Force of the Commission on Therapeutic Strategies of the International League Against Epilepsy.

G L Birbeck, J A French, E Perucca, D M Simpson, H Fraimow, J M George, J F Okulicz, D B Clifford, H Hachad, R H Levy and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in Neurology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neurological care for LGBT+ people.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Epilepsy Care in Transgender Patients.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022
    Review
  12. PaxlovidEpilepsy currents · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Global HIV neurology: a comprehensive review.AIDS (London, England) · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G L BirbeckInternational Neurologic & Psychiatric Epidemiology Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA. guidelines@aan.com
J A French
E Perucca
D M Simpson
H Fraimow
J M George
J F Okulicz
D B Clifford
H Hachad
R H Levy
Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology
Ad Hoc Task Force of the Commission on Therapeutic Strategies of the International League Against Epilepsy
Rowan University · USUnited States Army · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop guidelines for selection of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) among people with HIV/AIDS.

methodsThe literature was systematically reviewed to assess the global burden of relevant comorbid entities, to determine the number of patients who potentially utilize AEDs and antiretroviral agents (ARVs), and to address AED-ARV interactions. RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: AED-ARV administration may be indicated in up to 55% of people taking ARVs. Patients receiving phenytoin may require a lopinavir/ritonavir dosage increase of ~50% to maintain unchanged serum concentrations (Level C). Patients receiving valproic acid may require a zidovudine dosage reduction to maintain unchanged serum zidovudine concentrations (Level C). Coadministration of valproic acid and efavirenz may not require efavirenz dosage adjustment (Level C). Patients receiving ritonavir/atazanavir may require a lamotrigine dosage increase of ∼50% to maintain unchanged lamotrigine serum concentrations (Level C). Coadministration of raltegravir/atazanavir and lamotrigine may not require lamotrigine dosage adjustment (Level C). Coadministration of raltegravir and midazolam may not require midazolam dosage adjustment (Level C). Patients may be counseled that it is unclear whether dosage adjustment is necessary when other AEDs and ARVs are combined (Level U). It may be important to avoid enzyme-inducing AEDs in people on ARV regimens that include protease inhibitors or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, as pharmacokinetic interactions may result in virologic failure, which has clinical implications for disease progression and development of ARV resistance. If such regimens are required for seizure control, patients may be monitored through pharmacokinetic assessments to ensure efficacy of the ARV regimen (Level C).

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsChoice BehaviorEpilepsyEvidence-Based MedicineAcademies and InstitutesAcquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAnti-Retroviral AgentsDatabases, FactualHumansUnited StatesViral LoadAnticonvulsantsAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID22218281
PMCPMC3466673
OpenAlexW2125091429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.