Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22217208›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2012

Pepitome: evaluating improved spectral library search for identification complementarity and quality assessment.

Surendra Dasari, Matthew C Chambers, Misti A Martinez, Kristin L Carpenter, Amy-Joan L Ham, Lorenzo J Vega-Montoto, David L Tabb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Software Options for the Analysis of MS-Proteomic Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Surendra DasariDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center , Nashville, Tennessee 37232-8575, United States.
Matthew C Chambers
Misti A Martinez
Kristin L Carpenter
Amy-Joan L Ham
Lorenzo J Vega-Montoto
David L Tabb

Funding

Vanderbilt Proteome Characterization CenterU24CA159988 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LIEBLER, DANIEL C · 2011 to 2016
$13.9M
Clinical Proteomic Technology Assessment for CancerU24CA126479 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LIEBLER, DANIEL C · 2006 to 2010
$7.9M
New Proteomic Algorithms to Identify Mutant or Modified ProteinsR01CA126218 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI TABB, DAVID L · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA126218NCI NIH HHS R01CA126218NCI NIH HHS U24 CA126479NCI NIH HHS U24 CA159988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spectral libraries have emerged as a viable alternative to protein sequence databases for peptide identification. These libraries contain previously detected peptide sequences and their corresponding tandem mass spectra (MS/MS). Search engines can then identify peptides by comparing experimental MS/MS scans to those in the library. Many of these algorithms employ the dot product score for measuring the quality of a spectrum-spectrum match (SSM). This scoring system does not offer a clear statistical interpretation and ignores fragment ion m/z discrepancies in the scoring. We developed a new spectral library search engine, Pepitome, which employs statistical systems for scoring SSMs. Pepitome outperformed the leading library search tool, SpectraST, when analyzing data sets acquired on three different mass spectrometry platforms. We characterized the reliability of spectral library searches by confirming shotgun proteomics identifications through RNA-Seq data. Applying spectral library and database searches on the same sample revealed their complementary nature. Pepitome identifications enabled the automation of quality analysis and quality control (QA/QC) for shotgun proteomics data acquisition pipelines.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSearch EngineSoftwareBlood ProteinsCell LineDatabases, ProteinHumansModels, StatisticalNeural Networks, ComputerPeptide MappingProteomeReference StandardsSequence Analysis, ProteinSerum Albumin, BovineTandem Mass SpectrometryBlood ProteinsProteomeSerum Albumin, Bovine

Identifiers

PMID22217208
PMCPMC3292681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.