Early or late parenteral nutrition: ASPEN vs. ESPEN.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. A European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) position statement on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guidelines on acute kidney injury: part 1: definitions, conservative management and contrast-induced nephropathy.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2012
   Guideline
2. Increased health services use by severely obese patients undergoing emergency surgery: a retrospective cohort study.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2015
   Article
3. Establishment and assessment of new formulas for energy consumption estimation in adult burn patients.PloS one · 2014
   Article
4. Timing of (supplemental) parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a systematic review.Annals of intensive care · 2014
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults.2011

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.