ReviewThe New England journal of medicine2012
Genomics and perinatal care.
Review in The New England journal of medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis.The New England journal of medicine · 2012Trial
- Childhood outcomes of fetal genomic copy-number variants: The prenatal microarray cohort study.Genetics in medicine open · 2025Article
- Understanding Genetic Screening: Harnessing Health Information to Prevent Disease Risks.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
- Study protocol: childhood outcomes of fetal genomic variants: the PrenatAL Microarray (PALM) cohort study.BMC pediatrics · 2021Article
- Genetic Counseling and Assisted Reproductive Technologies.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020Review
- Re-examining the Ethics of Genetic Counselling in the Genomic Era.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2020Article
- Do patients who achieve pregnancy using IVF-PGS do the recommended genetic diagnostic testing in pregnancy?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2018Article
- Newborn screening and the era of medical genomics.Seminars in perinatology · 2015Review
- The gen-ethics bowl - an in-class activity combining genetics and bioethics.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2014Article
- Use of contemporary genetics in cardiovascular diagnosis.Circulation · 2014Review
- Trophoblast retrieval and isolation from the cervix (TRIC) for noninvasive prenatal screening at 5 to 20 weeks of gestation.Fertility and sterility · 2014Article
- Prenatal chromosomal microarray for the Catholic physician.The Linacre quarterly · 2014Article
- Prenatal diagnostic conundrum involving a novel ATP7A duplication.Clinical genetics · 2013Article
- Article
- Genomics, personalized medicine, and pediatrics.Academic pediatricsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.