Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22216116›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Differential effects of pravastatin and simvastatin on the growth of tumor cells from different organ sites.

David G Menter, Victoria P Ramsauer, Sam Harirforoosh, Kanishka Chakraborty, Peiying Yang, Linda Hsi, Robert A Newman, Koyamangalath Krishnan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Investigating potential anti-proliferative activity of different statins against five cancer cell lines.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Repurposing Drugs in Small Animal Oncology.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Roles of ABCA1 in cancer.Oncology letters · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David G MenterDepartment of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Victoria P Ramsauer
Sam Harirforoosh
Kanishka Chakraborty
Peiying Yang
Linda Hsi
Robert A Newman
Koyamangalath Krishnan
East Tennessee State University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Selenoprotein Targeting in Prostate CarcinogenesisR21CA102145 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MENTER, DAVID G · 2003 to 2004
$302k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA-102145NCI NIH HHS R21 CA102145NCI NIH HHS R21 CA-10241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) inhibitors, commonly known as statins, may possess cancer preventive and therapeutic properties. Statins are effective suppressors of cholesterol synthesis with a well-established risk-benefit ratio in cardiovascular disease prevention. Mechanistically, targeting HMGCR activity primarily influences cholesterol biosynthesis and prenylation of signaling proteins. Pravastatin is a hydrophilic statin that is selectively taken up by a sodium-independent organic anion transporter protein-1B1 (OATP1B1) exclusively expressed in liver. Simvastatin is a hydrophobic statin that enters cells by other mechanisms. Poorly-differentiated and well-differentiated cancer cell lines were selected from various tissues and examined for their response to these two statins. Simvastatin inhibited the growth of most tumor cell lines more effectively than pravastatin in a dose dependent manner. Poorly-differentiated cancer cells were generally more responsive to simvastatin than well-differentiated cancer cells, and the levels of HMGCR expression did not consistently correlate with response to statin treatment. Pravastatin had a significant effect on normal hepatocytes due to facilitated uptake and a lesser effect on prostate PC3 and colon Caco-2 cancer cells since the OATP1B1 mRNA and protein were only found in the normal liver and hepatocytes. The inhibition of cell growth was accompanied by distinct alterations in mitochondrial networks and dramatic changes in cellular morphology related to cofilin regulation and loss of p-caveolin. Both statins, hydrophilic pravastatin and hypdrophobic simvastatin caused redistribution of OATP1B1 and HMGCR to perinuclear sites. In conclusion, the specific chemical properties of different classes of statins dictate mechanistic properties which may be relevant when evaluating biological responses to statins.

Indexed as

Cell DivisionCell Line, TumorChromatography, High Pressure LiquidFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMicroscopy, FluorescenceNeoplasmsPravastatinReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSimvastatinTandem Mass SpectrometryHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPravastatinSimvastatin

Identifiers

PMID22216116
PMCPMC3245236
OpenAlexW1979658694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.