Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22215965›Full record

ArticleGenetics and molecular biology2011

Nucleotide diversity and molecular evolution of the WAG-2 gene in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L) and its relatives.

Shuhong Wei, Zhengsong Peng, Yonghong Zhou, Zaijun Yang, Kai Wu, Zhongming Ouyang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics and molecular biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Cloning and Functional Analysis of MADS-box Genes,Frontiers in plant science · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Genetic variation of six desaturase genes in flax and their impact on fatty acid composition.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2013
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. SNP Discovery through Next-Generation Sequencing and Its Applications.International journal of plant genomics · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shuhong WeiTriticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang, Chengdu City, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Zhengsong Peng
Yonghong Zhou
Zaijun Yang
Kai Wu
Zhongming Ouyang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, we examined the genetic diversity and evolution of the WAG-2 gene based on new WAG-2 alleles isolated from wheat and its relatives. Only single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and no insertions and deletions (indels) were found in exon sequences of WAG-2 from different species. More SNPs and indels occurred in introns than in exons. For exons, exons+introns and introns, the nucleotide polymorphism π decreased from diploid and tetraploid genotypes to hexaploid genotypes. This finding indicated that the diversity of WAG-2 in diploids was greater than in hexaploids because of the strong selection pressure on the latter. All dn/ds ratios were < 1.0, indicating that WAG-2 belongs to a conserved gene affected by negative selection. Thirty-nine of the 57 particular SNPs and eight of the 10 indels were detected in diploid species. The degree of divergence in intron length among WAG-2 clones and phylogenetic tree topology suggested the existence of three homoeologs in the A, B or D genome of common wheat. Wheat AG-like genes were divided into WAG-1 and WAG-2 clades. The latter clade contained WAG-2, OsMADS3 and ZMM2 genes, indicating functional homoeology among them.

Indexed as

copy number variationgenetic diversitymolecular evolutionTriticumWAG-2

Identifiers

PMID22215965
PMCPMC3229116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.