Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22215819›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2012

Evaluating bacterial gene-finding HMM structures as probabilistic logic programs.

Søren Mørk, Ian Holmes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Next-generation annotation of prokaryotic genomes with EuGene-P: application to Sinorhizobium meliloti 2011.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2013
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Søren MørkDepartment of Science, Systems and Models, Roskilde University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark. soer@ruc.dk
Ian Holmes

Funding

Evolutionary Modeling/Prediction of ncRNA Genes in FliesR01GM076705 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HOLMES, IAN H · 2006 to 2010
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076705NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM076705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationProbabilistic logic programming offers a powerful way to describe and evaluate structured statistical models. To investigate the practicality of probabilistic logic programming for structure learning in bioinformatics, we undertook a simplified bacterial gene-finding benchmark in PRISM, a probabilistic dialect of Prolog.

resultsWe evaluate Hidden Markov Model structures for bacterial protein-coding gene potential, including a simple null model structure, three structures based on existing bacterial gene finders and two novel model structures. We test standard versions as well as ADPH length modeling and three-state versions of the five model structures. The models are all represented as probabilistic logic programs and evaluated using the PRISM machine learning system in terms of statistical information criteria and gene-finding prediction accuracy, in two bacterial genomes. Neither of our implementations of the two currently most used model structures are best performing in terms of statistical information criteria or prediction performances, suggesting that better-fitting models might be achievable. AVAILABILITY: The source code of all PRISM models, data and additional scripts are freely available for download at: http://github.com/somork/codonhmm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialMarkov ChainsModels, GeneticAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceBacillus subtilisEscherichia coliModels, StatisticalProgramming LanguagesSequence Alignment

Identifiers

PMID22215819
PMCPMC3289911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.