Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22215603›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Novelty exposure overcomes foot shock-induced spatial-memory impairment by processes of synaptic-tagging in rats.

William Almaguer-Melian, Jorge Bergado-Rosado, Nancy Pavón-Fuentes, Esteban Alberti-Amador, Daymara Mercerón-Martínez, Julietta U Frey

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Molecular Substrates of Second-Order Conditioned Fear in the Basolateral Amygdala Complex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Behavioral tagging underlies memory reconsolidation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Role of hippocampal β-adrenergic and glucocorticoid receptors in the novelty-induced enhancement of fear extinction.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  14. Facilitation of fear extinction by novelty depends on dopamine acting on D1-subtype dopamine receptors in hippocampus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  15. Extinction learning, which consists of the inhibition of retrieval, can be learned without retrieval.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Hippocampal molecular mechanisms involved in the enhancement of fear extinction caused by exposure to novelty.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

William Almaguer-MelianDepartamento de Neurofisiología Experimental, Centro Internacional de Restauración Neurológica, Havana 11300, Cuba.
Jorge Bergado-Rosado
Nancy Pavón-Fuentes
Esteban Alberti-Amador
Daymara Mercerón-Martínez
Julietta U Frey
International Center of Neurologic Restoration · CUCuban Neuroscience Center · CUOtto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novelty processing can transform short-term into long-term memory. We propose that this memory-reinforcing effect of novelty could be explained by mechanisms outlined in the "synaptic tagging hypothesis." Initial short-term memory is sustained by a transient plasticity change at activated synapses and sets synaptic tags. These tags are later able to capture and process the plasticity-related proteins (PRPs), which are required to transform a short-term synaptic change into a long-term one. Novelty is involved in inducing the synthesis of PRPs [Moncada D, et al. (2011) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:12937-12936], which are then captured by the tagged synapses, consolidating memory. In contrast to novelty, stress can impair learning, memory, and synaptic plasticity. Here, we address questions as to whether novelty-induced PRPs are able to prevent the loss of memory caused by stress and if the latter would not interact with the tag-setting process. We used water-maze (WM) training as a spatial learning paradigm to test our hypothesis. Stress was induced by a strong foot shock (FS; 5 × 1 mA, 2 s) applied 5 min after WM training. Our data show that FS reduced long-term but not short-term memory in the WM paradigm. This negative effect on memory consolidation was time- and training-dependent. Interestingly, novelty exposure prevented the stress-induced memory loss of the spatial task and increased BDNF and Arc expression. This rescuing effect was blocked by anisomycin, suggesting that WM-tagged synapses were not reset by FS and were thus able to capture the novelty-induced PRPs, re-establishing FS-impaired long-term memory.

Indexed as

ElectroshockExploratory BehaviorAnimalsFootGene Expression RegulationMaleMaze LearningMemoryMemory DisordersProtein BiosynthesisRatsRats, WistarSynapsesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID22215603
PMCPMC3271890
OpenAlexW2007474550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.