ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2012
External validation of the KORA S4/F4 prediction models for the risk of developing type 2 diabetes in older adults: the PREVEND study.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved Functional Causal Likelihood-Based Causal Discovery Method for Diabetes Risk Factors.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021Article
- Handgrip strength improves prediction of type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study.Annals of medicine · 2020Observational
- Random plasma glucose predicts the diagnosis of diabetes.PloS one · 2019Article
- Article
- Validation of the German Diabetes Risk Score among the general adult population: findings from the German Health Interview and Examination Surveys.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2016Article
- BiobankConnect: software to rapidly connect data elements for pooled analysis across biobanks using ontological and lexical indexing.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015Article
- The Generation R Study: Biobank update 2015.European journal of epidemiology · 2014Article
- Review
- The Rotterdam Study: 2014 objectives and design update.European journal of epidemiology · 2013Article
- Liver function tests and risk prediction of incident type 2 diabetes: evaluation in two independent cohorts.PloS one · 2012Article
- Adapting and validating diabetes simulation models across settings: accounting for mortality differences using administrative data.Journal of diabetes and its complicationsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, prediction models for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in older adults (aged ≥55 year) were developed in the KORA S4/F4 study, Augsburg, Germany. We aimed to externally validate the KORA models in a Dutch population. We used data on both older adults (n = 2,050; aged ≥55 year) and total non-diabetic population (n = 6,317; aged 28-75 year) for this validation. We assessed performance of base model (model 1: age, sex, BMI, smoking, parental diabetes and hypertension) and two clinical models: model 1 plus fasting glucose (model 2); and model 2 plus uric acid (model 3). For 7-year risk of T2DM, we calculated C-statistic, Hosmer-Lemeshow χ(2)-statistic, and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) as measures of discrimination, calibration and reclassification, respectively. After a median follow-up of 7.7 years, 199 (9.7%) and 374 (5.9%) incident cases of T2DM were ascertained in the older and total population, respectively. In the older adults, C-statistic was 0.66 for model 1. This was improved for model 2 and model 3 (C-statistic = 0.81) with significant IDI. In the total population, these respective C-statistics were 0.77, 0.85 and 0.85. All models showed poor calibration (P < 0.001). After adjustment for the intercept and slope of each model, we observed good calibration for most models in both older and total populations. We validated the KORA clinical models for prediction of T2DM in an older Dutch population, with discrimination similar to the development cohort. However, the models need to be corrected for intercept and slope to acquire good calibration for application in a different setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22215562What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.