ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2012
An update on the evaluation and management of pulmonary hypertension in scleroderma.
Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial of Oral Anticoagulation in Systemic Sclerosis-Related Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Results From the SPHInX Study.Pulmonary circulation · 2026Article
- Pulmonary hypertension phenotypes in patients with systemic sclerosis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedSchrieber, Benjamin [corrected to Schreiber, Benjamin]
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with scleroderma (SScPAH) is a debilitating, highly lethal condition that responds to an array of therapies. Quality of life and prognosis are substantially improved by treatment, and early diagnosis and treatment are associated with improved outcomes. There are serious limitations to current screening programs. Many more questions need to be addressed. Why is PAH so common in SSc? Why is the tolerance of pulmonary hypertension so poor in scleroderma? What are the best measures of response to therapy in SSc patients with PAH? Should we use different parameters in prognostic scores in SScPAH? Why is postcapillary pulmonary hypertension so common in SSc? How do we reliably differentiate lung disease-associated pulmonary hypertension from PAH? The aim of this review is to summarize the main areas of progress over the past decade and to look to the challenges for the next decade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.