Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22215128›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2012

Dosimetric integration of daily mega-voltage cone-beam CT for image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

A Zabel-du Bois, S Nill, S Ulrich, U Oelfke, B Rhein, P Haering, S Milker-Zabel, A Schwahofer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Imaging analysis of jaw defects reparation with antigen-extracted porcine cancellous bone].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. [Organizational models of inpatient emergency and acute care].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2014
    Article
  5. Dosimetric properties and commissioning of cone-beam CT image beam line with a carbon target.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2013
    Article
  6. Article
  7. [Rules and regulations applying to incidents in radiotherapy].Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A Zabel-du BoisDepartment of Radiooncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. a.zabel@dkfz-heidelberg.de
S Nill
S Ulrich
U Oelfke
B Rhein
P Haering
S Milker-Zabel
A Schwahofer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe goal of this work was to compare different methods of incorporating the additional dose of mega-voltage cone-beam CT (MV-CBCT) for image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of different tumor entities. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe absolute dose delivered by the MV-CBCT was calculated and considered by creating a scaled IMRT plan (scIMRT) by renormalizing the clinically approved plan (orgIMRT) so that the sum with the MV-CBCT dose yields the same prescribed dose. In the other case, a newly optimized plan (optIMRT) was generated by including the dose distribution of the MV-CBCT as pre-irradiation. Both plans were compared with the orgIMRT plan and a plan where the last fraction was skipped.

resultsNo significant changes were observed regarding the 95% conformity index of the target volume. The mean dose of the organs at risk (OAR) increased by approx. 7% for the scIMRT plan and 5% for the optIMRT plan. A significant increase of the mean dose to the outline contour was observed, ranging from 3.1 ± 1.3% (optIMRT) to 13.0 ± 6.1% (scIMRT) for both methods over all entities. If the dose of daily MV-CBCT would have been ignored, the additional dose accumulated to nearly a whole treatment fraction with a general increase of approx. 10% to the OARs and approx. 4% to the target volume.

conclusionBoth methods of incorporating the additional MV-CBCT dose into the treatment plan are suitable for clinical practice. The dose distribution of the target volume could be achieved as conformal as with the orgIMRT plan, while only a moderate increase of mean dose to OAR was observed.

Indexed as

Body BurdenRadiometryRadiotherapy DosageCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy, Image-Guided

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.