ArticleRheumatology international2013
Fibronectin molecular status determination useful to differentiate between rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus patients.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To find whether the plasma fibronectin (FN) molecular status can be useful to differentiate between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The expression of plasma FN domains was determined by ELISA using monoclonal domain-specific antibodies. FN molecular forms were revealed by immunoblotting and analyzed by densitometry. The following findings were found: (1) Mean values of (Fibrin-Heparin)FN concentration were lower in SLE and RA patients than in normal plasmas. The cut off points at 31 mg/l in SLE and at 45 mg/l in RA showed a sensitivity and specificity of 54, 55 and 75%, respectively. (2) Mean values of concentrations of (CBD)FN and (Ct)FN were lower in SLE than those in normal and RA plasmas. Quantified data showed the cut off points of (CBD)FN and (Ct)FN at 200 mg/l (58% of sensitivity, 56% of specificity) and 350 mg/l (58% of sensitivity, 58% of specificity) in SLE, as well as at 295 mg/l (52% of sensitivity, 51% of specificity) and 460 mg/l in RA (70% of sensitivity, 73% of specificity). (3) The plasma FN immunopatterns, characterized by the presence of high-molecular (260-310 kDa) and/or low-molecular (158-209 kDa) FN bands, were specific only for SLE samples. The analysis of plasma FN status revealed by its Fibrin-Heparin-, CBD- and Ct-domain reactivity with monoclonal antibody and immunoblotting can be helpful to differentiate the SLE in respect to RA and normal plasmas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.