Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22214261›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2012

Optimizing Illumina next-generation sequencing library preparation for extremely AT-biased genomes.

Samuel O Oyola, Thomas D Otto, Yong Gu, Gareth Maslen, Magnus Manske, Susana Campino, Daniel J Turner, Bronwyn Macinnis, Dominic P Kwiatkowski, Harold P Swerdlow and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The complete mitochondrial genome and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Samuel O OyolaWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK. so1@sanger.ac.uk
Thomas D Otto
Yong Gu
Gareth Maslen
Magnus Manske
Susana Campino
Daniel J Turner
Bronwyn Macinnis
Dominic P Kwiatkowski
Harold P Swerdlow
Michael A Quail

Funding

Medical Research Council G0600718Medical Research Council G19/9Wellcome Trust 079355/Z/06/ZWellcome Trust 090532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMassively parallel sequencing technology is revolutionizing approaches to genomic and genetic research. Since its advent, the scale and efficiency of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) has rapidly improved. In spite of this success, sequencing genomes or genomic regions with extremely biased base composition is still a great challenge to the currently available NGS platforms. The genomes of some important pathogenic organisms like Plasmodium falciparum (high AT content) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (high GC content) display extremes of base composition. The standard library preparation procedures that employ PCR amplification have been shown to cause uneven read coverage particularly across AT and GC rich regions, leading to problems in genome assembly and variation analyses. Alternative library-preparation approaches that omit PCR amplification require large quantities of starting material and hence are not suitable for small amounts of DNA/RNA such as those from clinical isolates. We have developed and optimized library-preparation procedures suitable for low quantity starting material and tolerant to extremely high AT content sequences.

resultsWe have used our optimized conditions in parallel with standard methods to prepare Illumina sequencing libraries from a non-clinical and a clinical isolate (containing ~53% host contamination). By analyzing and comparing the quality of sequence data generated, we show that our optimized conditions that involve a PCR additive (TMAC), produces amplified libraries with improved coverage of extremely AT-rich regions and reduced bias toward GC neutral templates.

conclusionWe have developed a robust and optimized Next-Generation Sequencing library amplification method suitable for extremely AT-rich genomes. The new amplification conditions significantly reduce bias and retain the complexity of either extremes of base composition. This development will greatly benefit sequencing clinical samples that often require amplification due to low mass of DNA starting material.

Indexed as

Gene LibraryGenome, ProtozoanBase CompositionDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesGenetic LociHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPlasmodium falciparumPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsViral Proteinsbacteriophage T7 RNA polymeraseDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22214261
PMCPMC3312816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.