Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22213013›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2012

Evolution and taxonomic split of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon.

Pilar Catalán, Jochen Müller, Robert Hasterok, Glyn Jenkins, Luis A J Mur, Tim Langdon, Alexander Betekhtin, Dorota Siwinska, Manuel Pimentel, Diana López-Alvarez

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
37.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 194 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Pilar CatalánDepartment of Agriculture, High Polytechnic School of Huesca, University of Zaragoza, Spain. pcatalan@unizar.es
Jochen Müller
Robert Hasterok
Glyn Jenkins
Luis A J Mur
Tim Langdon
Alexander Betekhtin
Dorota Siwinska
Manuel Pimentel
Diana López-Alvarez
University of Silesia in Katowice · PLInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences · GBUniversidad de Zaragoza · ESAberystwyth University · GBFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DEUniversidade da Coruña · ES

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/W/00003130ABiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/W/00003130B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsBrachypodium distachyon is being widely investigated across the world as a model plant for temperate cereals. This annual plant has three cytotypes (2n = 10, 20, 30) that are still regarded as part of a single species. Here, a multidisciplinary study has been conducted on a representative sampling of the three cytotypes to investigate their evolutionary relationships and origins, and to elucidate if they represent separate species.

methodsStatistical analyses of 15 selected phenotypic traits were conducted in individuals from 36 lines or populations. Cytogenetic analyses were performed through flow cytometry, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with genomic (GISH) and multiple DNA sequences as probes, and comparative chromosome painting (CCP). Phylogenetic analyses were based on two plastid (ndhF, trnLF) and five nuclear (ITS, ETS, CAL, DGAT, GI) genes from different Brachypodium lineages, whose divergence times and evolutionary rates were estimated. KEY

resultsThe phenotypic analyses detected significant differences between the three cytotypes and demonstrated stability of characters in natural populations. Genome size estimations, GISH, FISH and CCP confirmed that the 2n = 10 and 2n = 20 cytotypes represent two different diploid taxa, whereas the 2n = 30 cytotype represents the allotetraploid derived from them. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that the 2n = 20 and 2n = 10 cytotypes emerged from two independent lineages that were, respectively, the maternal and paternal genome donors of the 2n = 30 cytotype. The 2n = 20 lineage was older and mutated significantly faster than the 2n = 10 lineage and all the core perennial Brachypodium species.

conclusionsThe substantial phenotypic, cytogenetic and molecular differences detected among the three B. distachyon sensu lato cytotypes are indicative of major speciation processes within this complex that allow their taxonomic separation into three distinct species. We have kept the name B. distachyon for the 2n = 10 cytotype and have described two novel species as B. stacei and B. hybridum for, respectively, the 2n = 20 and 2n = 30 cytotypes.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationBiological EvolutionBrachypodiumCytogeneticsDNA, PlantEdible GrainEvolution, MolecularGenetic VariationGenome, PlantPhenotypePhylogenySequence Analysis, DNADNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID22213013
PMCPMC3268539
OpenAlexW2158298110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.