ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings2012
My treatment approach to hairy cell leukemia.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hairy Cell Leukemia: A Rare Differential for an Infiltrative Pancreatic Mass.ACG case reports journal · 2026Article
- Hairy cell leukemia: a chronic B-cell lymphoma with unique clinicopathological features and unresolved molecular mechanisms.Blood advances · 2026Review
- Exploring adenosine analogs for chondrosarcoma therapy:Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Article
- Article
- Oncological management dilemma: a rare presentation of hairy cell leukaemia with hepatic involvement presenting concomitantly with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.BMJ case reports · 2022Article
- Adverse event rates and economic burden associated with purine nucleoside analogs in patients with hairy cell leukemia: a US population-retrospective claims analysis.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020Article
- Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with classic hairy cell leukemia.Blood · 2017Article
- Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Cladribine: Subcutaneous versus Intravenous Administration in Hairy Cell Leukemia Patients.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2015Article
- Treatment of refractory hairy cell leukemia with a BRAF-inhibitor: lessons to be learnt.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2014Article
- Immunotoxins for leukemia.Blood · 2014Review
- Hairy cell leukemia: short review, today's recommendations and outlook.Blood cancer journal · 2014Article
- Pancytopenia in a 70-year-old african-american male: an unusual presentation of a rare disease.Case reports in hematology · 2014Article
- Hairy cell leukemia in kidney transplantation: lesson from a rare disorder.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2013Article
- OPSI threat in hematological patients.Translational medicine @ UniSa · 2013Article
- Outcome of hairy cell leukemia patients treated with cladribine - a 10-year single-center experience in Pakistan.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapyArticle
- A Unique Hairy Cell Leukemia Variant.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare chronic lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by circulating B cells with cytoplasmic projections, pancytopenia, splenomegaly, and a typical flow cytometry pattern. Recently, the BRAF V600E mutation was uniformly identified in one HCL series, which may provide insights into the pathogenic mechanisms. The disease course is usually indolent but inexorably progressive. Patients require treatment when they have significant cytopenia or occasionally recurrent infections from immunocompromise. In the mid-1980s, interferon replaced splenectomy as the initial treatment. A few years later, 2 purine nucleoside analogs, cladribine and pentostatin, showed promising activity in HCL. Complete response rates approached 95% with cladribine given as a single 7-day intravenous infusion. Newer methods of cladribine administration and modified dosing schedules have since been studied. Pentostatin response rates are comparable. We generally prefer cladribine because of its ease of administration, single infusion schema, and favorable toxicity profile. Since the introduction of these drugs, which have never been randomly compared, long-term follow-up studies have confirmed impressive and durable response durations. However, roughly 40% of patients with HCL eventually relapse. In this setting, patients can be re-treated with purine analogs. Rituximab also has a reasonable response rate in relapsed HCL; it can be given as a single agent sequentially after purine nucleosides or concurrently. Immunotoxins have robust responses but remain in development. Targeting the BRAF pathway will be an exciting future area of research. Many patients have minimal residual disease after initial treatment, but the clinical significance of this remains unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.