Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22212494›Full record

Trial reportPediatric surgery international2012

A prospective, randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy of diltiazem, glyceryl trinitrate, and lidocaine for the treatment of anal fissure in children.

Muazez Cevik, Mehmet Emin Boleken, Ibrahim Koruk, Servet Ocal, Mehmet Emin Balcioglu, Asim Aydinoglu, Cetin Ali Karadag

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric surgery international, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02419534 (Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Polyethylene Glycol Alone and Polyethylene Glycol Combined With Topical Diltiazem in Treating Anal fissure in Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02419534 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Polyethylene Glycol Alone and Polyethylene Glycol Combined With Topical Diltiazem in Treating Anal fissure in Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing Saud UniversityRan2014 to 2016Enrolled46ConditionsFissure in AnoArmsPolyethylene glycol, Polyethylene glycol with Diltiazem
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Common anorectal disorders.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muazez CevikÇocuk Cerrahisi Anabilim Dali, Harran Universitesi Tip Fakultesi, Morfoloji Binasi, Yenisehir Kampusu, 63300, Sanliurfa, Turkey. cevikmuazzez@gmail.com
Mehmet Emin Boleken
Ibrahim Koruk
Servet Ocal
Mehmet Emin Balcioglu
Asim Aydinoglu
Cetin Ali Karadag
Harran University · TRDr. Siyami Ersek Göğüs Kalp Ve Damar Cerrahisi Eğitim Ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnal fissure (AF) is a common perianal condition in children. Although adult patients with AF have been treated successfully using diltiazem, it has not been studied in children. The present randomized, prospective, double-blind study assessed the response, side effects, and recurrence of diltiazem.

methodsNinety-three children with AF were randomly divided into three groups. Each group received topical ointment. Group GTN received 0.2% glyceryl trinitrate, group L received 10% lidocaine, and group D received 2% diltiazem ointment.

resultsEighty-two patients completed the 12-month study. At the end of the first 8-week course, the healing rate in group D was significantly higher than that of the other groups (p < 0.0001, χ (2) = 19.82). Nonresponders received a second course of the same treatment. Group D showed significantly higher healing rates than the other groups (p < 0.05, χ (2) = 7.227) at the end of the second 8-week course. The group D recurrence rate was significantly different than that of the other groups (p < 0. 002, χ (2) = 12.79).

conclusionDiltiazem application is effective and safe for the treatment of AF in children, and has a low recurrence rate. The smooth dose-concentration curve causes minimal side effects.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalChildChild, PreschoolDiltiazemDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFissure in AnoHumansInfantLidocaineMaleNitroglycerinProspective StudiesVasodilator AgentsAnesthetics, LocalDiltiazemLidocaineNitroglycerinVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID22212494
OpenAlexW2033992256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.