Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22212296›Full record

ArticleHuman heredity2012

Performance of genotype imputations using data from the 1000 Genomes Project.

Yun Ju Sung, Lihua Wang, Tuomo Rankinen, Claude Bouchard, D C Rao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human heredity, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Migraine-Associated Common Genetic Variants Confer Greater Risk of Posterior vs. Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke☆.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The future for genetic studies in reproduction.Molecular human reproduction · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yun Ju SungDivision of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, Mo. 63110, USA. yunju@wubios.wustl.edu
Lihua Wang
Tuomo Rankinen
Claude Bouchard
D C Rao

Funding

HERITAGE STUDY: GENETICS, EXERCISE &RISK FACTORSR01HL045670 · NHLBI · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI RANKINEN, TUOMO · 1992 to 2010
$6.8M
The Family Blood Pressure Program (Program Data Center)U01HL054473 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI RAO, DABEERU C · 2000 to 2008
$5.8M
RESEARCH PROJECT IN GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGYR01GM028719 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI RAO, DABEERU C · 1985 to 2008
$2.0M
HYPERGEN- DATA COORDINATING CENTERU10HL054473 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI RAO, DABEERU C · 1995 to 1999
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HL 45670NHLBI NIH HHS HL 54473NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL045670NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL054473NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL054473NIGMS NIH HHS GM 28719NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM028719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genotype imputations based on 1000 Genomes (1KG) Project data have the advantage of imputing many more SNPs than imputations based on HapMap data. It also provides an opportunity to discover associations with relatively rare variants. Recent investigations are increasingly using 1KG data for genotype imputations, but only limited evaluations of the performance of this approach are available. In this paper, we empirically evaluated imputation performance using 1KG data by comparing imputation results to those using the HapMap Phase II data that have been widely used. We used three reference panels: the CEU panel consisting of 120 haplotypes from HapMap II and 1KG data (June 2010 release) and the EUR panel consisting of 566 haplotypes also from 1KG data (August 2010 release). We used Illumina 324,607 autosomal SNPs genotyped in 501 individuals of European ancestry. Our most important finding was that both 1KG reference panels provided much higher imputation yield than the HapMap II panel. There were more than twice as many successfully imputed SNPs as there were using the HapMap II panel (6.7 million vs. 2.5 million). Our second most important finding was that accuracy using both 1KG panels was high and almost identical to accuracy using the HapMap II panel. Furthermore, after removing SNPs with MACH Rsq <0.3, accuracy for both rare and low frequency SNPs was very high and almost identical to accuracy for common SNPs. We found that imputation using the 1KG-EUR panel had advantages in successfully imputing rare, low frequency and common variants. Our findings suggest that 1KG-based imputation can increase the opportunity to discover significant associations for SNPs across the allele frequency spectrum. Because the 1KG Project is still underway, we expect that later versions will provide even better imputation performance.

Indexed as

GenotypeHapMap ProjectComputational BiologyGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of ResultsWhite People

Identifiers

PMID22212296
PMCPMC3322630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.