Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22211972›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2011

The blessings and curses of C57BL/6 substrains in mouse genetic studies.

Camron D Bryant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A New Mouse Model for Ozone Health Effects Research.Environmental health perspectives · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Obesity accelerates cardiovascular ageing.European heart journal · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Camron D BryantDepartment of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. camron@uchicago.edu

Funding

Genetic Basis of Opioid Reward and Aversion in MiceK99DA029635 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BRYANT, CAMRON D · 2011 to 2012
$296k
NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA029635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotypic and genetic differences among C57BL/6 substrains are accumulating. Investigators must address these differences to improve the quality of their studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID22211972
PMCPMC4944652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.