Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22211818›Full record

ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2012

C-reactive protein concentration predicts mortality in type 2 diabetes: the Diabetes Heart Study.

A J Cox, S Agarwal, D M Herrington, J J Carr, B I Freedman, D W Bowden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with diabetes.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2017
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Diabetes, diabetic complications, and fracture risk.Current osteoporosis reports · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A J CoxCenter for Human Genomics, Department of Biochemistry, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
S Agarwal
D M Herrington
J J Carr
B I Freedman
D W Bowden

Funding

Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in diabetesR01HL067348 · NHLBI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BOWDEN, DONALD W · 2001 to 2004
$4.3M
Genetic Epidemiology of Cerebrovascular Disease and Cognition in DiabetesR01NS058700 · NINDS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BOWDEN, DONALD W · 2008 to 2012
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL067348NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL09230NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL67348NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS058700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAlthough current American Heart Association guidelines address C-reactive protein concentration and cardiovascular disease risk, it remains unclear whether this paradigm is consistent across populations with differing disease burdens. Individuals with Type 2 diabetes mellitus represent one group at increased risk of cardiovascular disease and subsequent mortality. This study aimed to examine the relationship between C-reactive protein concentrations and risk for all-cause mortality in European Americans with Type 2 diabetes from the Diabetes Heart Study.

methodsA total of 846 European Americans with Type 2 diabetes and baseline measures of C-reactive protein were evaluated. Vital status was determined after a follow-up period of 7.3 ± 2.1 years (mean ± SD). C-reactive protein concentrations were compared between living and deceased subgroups along with other known risk factors for cardiovascular disease, including blood lipids. Logistic regression was performed to determine risk for mortality associated with increasing C-reactive protein concentrations.

resultsAt follow-up 160 individuals (18.7%) were deceased. No significant differences in baseline serum glucose or lipid measures were observed between living and deceased subgroups. Baseline C-reactive protein concentrations were significantly higher in the deceased subgroup (9.37 ± 15.94) compared with the living subgroup (5.36 ± 7.91 mg/l; P < 0.0001). Participants with C-reactive protein concentrations of 3-10 mg/l were approximately two times more likely to be deceased at follow-up (OR 2.06; 95% CI 1.17-3.62); those with C-reactive protein >10 mg/l were more than five times more likely to be deceased (OR 5.24; CI 2.80-9.38).

conclusionsThis study documents the utility of C-reactive protein in predicting risk for all-cause mortality in European Americans with Type 2 diabetes and supports its use as a screening tool in risk prediction models.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersCohort StudiesC-Reactive ProteinDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic AngiopathiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInflammationLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsBiomarkersC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID22211818
PMCPMC4386279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.