ReviewThe American journal of drug and alcohol abuse2012
Overview of special sub-section on money management articles: cross-disciplinary perspectives on money management by addicts.
Review in The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Earning, Spending, and Drug Use in a Therapeutic Workplace.The Psychological record · 2017Article
- Factors Associated with Money Mismanagement Among Adults with Severe Mental Illness and Substance Abuse.International journal of mental health and addiction · 2016Article
- Cocaine behavioral economics: from the naturalistic environment to the controlled laboratory setting.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2014Article
- Recovery post treatment: plans, barriers and motivators.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHow addicts manage their funds can be understood from the studies of impulsive spending, contingency management, self-reported expenditures, behavioral economics, and anthropology.
objectiveTo show how these differing perspectives can provide theoretical explanations for substance abuse, they were applied to the question of when extra "windfall" funds are spent on substances of abuse. Treatment implications of these perspectives were examined.
methodsRelevant literature was reviewed.
resultsBehavioral economics and related approaches provide the basis for money-management-based interventions targeting substance abuse, informed configuration of reinforcers to compete with substances, and therapeutically framing the choice between abstinence and substance use. CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: A cross-discipline consideration of how addicts manage their funds has the potential to inform and improve substance abuse treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.