Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22211441›Full record

ReviewJournal of trauma & dissociation : the official journal of the International Society for the Study of Dissociation (ISSD)2012

Pediatric bipolar disorder in an era of "mindless psychiatry".

Peter I Parry, Edmund C Levin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of trauma & dissociation : the official journal of the International Society for the Study of Dissociation (ISSD), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Competent psychopharmacology.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2014
    Review
  5. A comparison of American and English hospital discharge rates for pediatric bipolar disorder, 2000 to 2010.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2014
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The place of psychotherapy in contemporary psychiatry.Iranian journal of psychiatry and behavioral sciences · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter I ParryDepartment of Psychiatry, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia. peter.parry@flinders.edu.au
Edmund C Levin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePediatric bipolar disorder (PBD) reflects shifts in conceptualizing bipolar disorder among children and adolescents since the mid-1990s. Since then, PBD diagnoses, predominantly in the United States, have increased dramatically, and the diagnosis has attracted significant controversy. During the same period, psychiatric theory and practice has become increasingly biological. The aim of this paper is to examine the rise of PBD in terms of wider systemic influences.

methodIn the context of literature referring to paradigm shifts in psychiatry, we reviewed the psychiatric literature, media cases, and information made available by investigative committees and journalists.

resultsSocial historians and prominent psychiatrists describe a paradigm shift in psychiatry over recent decades: from an era of "brainless psychiatry," when an emphasis on psychodynamic and family factors predominated to the exclusion of biological factors, to a current era of "mindless psychiatry" that emphasizes neurobiological explanations for emotional and behavioral problems with limited regard for contextual meaning. Associated with this has been a tendency within psychiatry and society to neglect trauma and attachment insecurity as etiological factors; the "atheoretical" (but by default biomedical) premise of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd and 4th eds.); the influence of the pharmaceutical industry in research, continuing medical education, and direct-to-consumer advertising; and inequality in the U.S. health system that favors "diagnostic upcoding." Harm from overmedicating children is now a cause of public concern.

conclusionIt can be argued that PBD as a widespread diagnosis, particularly in the United States, reflects multiple factors associated with a paradigm shift within psychiatry rather than recognition of a previously overlooked common disorder.

Indexed as

Adolescent PsychiatryChild PsychiatryAdolescentAge of OnsetAntipsychotic AgentsBipolar DisorderChildChild, PreschoolDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersHumansPhenotypeReactive Attachment DisorderUnited StatesAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID22211441
PMCPMC3474133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.