ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2011
Percutaneous and surgical treatment of mitral valve regurgitation.
Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01301625 (A Prospective Single Arm Clinical Trial Evaluating the MitraClip System in Australia and New Zealand), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Single Arm Clinical Trial Evaluating the MitraClip System in Australia and New Zealand
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Looking towards the future: patient-specific computational modeling to optimize outcomes for transcatheter mitral valve repair.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Safety and efficacy outcomes at 1 year after MitraClip therapy for percutaneous mitral valve repair in patients with severe mitral regurgitation: the Egyptian experience.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2021Article
- [Ischemic mitral regurgitation : pathomechanisms and current therapeutic options].Der Internist · 2013Article
- Mitral valve repair: the chordae tendineae.The journal of Tehran Heart Center · 2012Article
- Percutaneous mitral valve repair: A new treatment for mitral regurgitation.Indian heart journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMitral valve regurgitation is the second most common clinically relevant valvular heart disease in adults, with an incidence of about 2% to 3% per year. Surgical mitral valve repair is the treatment of choice. Recent years have seen major advances in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Several new catheter-based techniques are now being clinically evaluated, including percutaneous endovascular mitral valve repair with a mitral clip.
methodThis review is based on a selective review of the literature and on the authors' clinical experience.
resultsMinimally invasive and reconstructive techniques for mitral valve surgery have come into more common use in recent years. In Germany, more than 50% of all mitral valve defects are now treated with a valve-preserving repair procedure. At the same time, percutaneous techniques have been developed that enable reduction of mitral regurgitation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, without surgery. The implantation of a mitral clip is the sole currently approved technique of this type. In a recently published, randomized comparative clinical trial (EVEREST II), it was found to be safer, but less effective, than surgery.
conclusionMitral valve surgery remains the treatment of choice for severe mitral regurgitation. For patients at high risk from surgery, and particularly those with severe heart failure, the implantation of a mitral clip is a safe and feasible treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.