Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22211147›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2011

Bronchiectasis--diagnosis and treatment.

Jessica Rademacher, Tobias Welte

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05936788 (Comparative Effects of Active Cycle of Breathing Technique and Diaphragmatic Breathing on Pulmonary Function and Sputum Diary After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05936788 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of Active Cycle of Breathing Technique and Diaphragmatic Breathing on Pulmonary Function and Sputum Diary After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled32ConditionsBreathing ExercisesArmsActive cycle of breathing technique, diaphragmatic breathing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Inflammatory Phenotypes of Bronchiectasis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ejaculate in differential diagnosis.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica RademacherKlinik für Pneumologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.
Tobias Welte
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiologically evident bronchiectasis is seen in 30% to 50% of patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). As COPD is now becoming more common around the world, bronchiectasis is as well.

methodsWe review pertinent articles published before May 2011 that were retrieved by a selective PubMed search.

resultsThe principles of treatment of bronchiectasis in patients who do not have cystic fibrosis ("non-CF bronchiectasis") are derived from the treatment of other diseases: secretolytic and anti-infectious treatment are given as in cystic fibrosis, while anti-obstructive treatment is given as in COPD. The few randomized trials of treatment for non-CF bronchiectasis that have been completed to date do not permit the formulation of any evidence-based recommendations. Many potential treatments are now under evaluation. Hypertonic saline is often used because of its demonstrated benefit in CF, even though no benefit has yet been shown for non-CF bronchiectasis. Phase II trials of inhaled mannitol have yielded promising results, leading to phase III trials that are now underway. There may be a future role for inhaled antibiotics, particularly in patients colonized with Gram-negative pathogens. Inhaled tobramycin and colistin are well established in clinical practice, though not approved for non-CF bronchiectasis; clinical trials of aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, and gentamicin are ongoing. Macrolides seem to bring an additional benefit, though the studies that documented this involved only small numbers of patients. Long-term treatment with inhaled antibiotics and/or macrolides is indicated only if a benefit is seen within three months of the start of treatment (less sputum, no exacerbations).

conclusionA national registry of patients with bronchiectasis should be established to help us gain better knowledge of its prognostic factors and treatment options.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAnti-Bacterial AgentsBronchiectasisHumansMacrolidesMannitolPrevalenceSaline Solution, HypertonicTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsMacrolidesMannitolSaline Solution, Hypertonic

Identifiers

PMID22211147
PMCPMC3244167
OpenAlexW2131138039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.