Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22210766›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2012

Altered regulation of Escherichia coli biotin biosynthesis in BirA superrepressor mutant strains.

Vandana Chakravartty, John E Cronan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Proximity-dependent labeling methods for proteomic profiling in living cells: An update.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Proximity-dependent labeling methods for proteomic profiling in living cells.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2017
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mechanisms of biotin-regulated gene expression in microbes.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vandana ChakravarttyDepartment of Microbiology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
John E Cronan
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

GENETIC APPROACHES TO REGULATION OF LIPID METABOLISMR01AI015650 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI CRONAN, JOHN E. · 1985 to 2022
$12.0M
GENETIC APPROACHES TO REGULATION OF LIPID METABOLISMR37AI015650 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI CRONAN, JOHN E. · 1994 to 2003
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS AI15650NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI015650NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI015650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription of the Escherichia coli biotin (bio) operon is directly regulated by the biotin protein ligase BirA, the enzyme that covalently attaches biotin to its cognate acceptor proteins. Binding of BirA to the bio operator requires dimerization of the protein, which is triggered by BirA-catalyzed synthesis of biotinoyl-adenylate (biotinoyl-5'-AMP), the obligatory intermediate of the ligation reaction. Although several aspects of this regulatory system are well understood, no BirA superrepressor mutant strains had been isolated. Such superrepressor BirA proteins would repress the biotin operon transcription in vivo at biotin concentrations well below those needed for repression by wild-type BirA. We isolated mutant strains having this phenotype by a combined selection-screening approach and resolved multiple mutations to give several birA superrepressor alleles, each having a single mutation, all of which showed repression dominant over that of the wild-type allele. All of these mutant strains repressed bio operon transcription in vivo at biotin concentrations that gave derepression of the wild-type strain and retained sufficient ligation activity for growth when overexpressed. All of the strains except that encoding G154D BirA showed derepression of bio operon transcription upon overproduction of a biotin-accepting protein. In BirA, G154D was a lethal mutation in single copy, and the purified protein was unable to transfer biotin from enzyme-bound biotinoyl-adenylate either to the natural acceptor protein or to a biotin-accepting peptide sequence. Consistent with the transcriptional repression data, each of the purified mutant proteins showed increased affinity for the biotin operator DNA in electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Surprisingly, although most of the mutations were located in the catalytic domain, all of those tested, except G154D BirA, had normal ligase activity. Most of the mutations that gave superrepressor phenotypes altered residues located close to the dimerization interface of BirA. However, two mutations were located at sites well removed from the interface. The properties of the superrepressor mutants strengthen and extend other data indicating that BirA function entails extensive interactions among the three domains of the protein and show that normal ligase activity does not ensure normal DNA binding.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialSuppression, GeneticBiotinCarbon-Nitrogen LigasesDNA, BacterialElectrophoretic Mobility Shift AssayEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsModels, BiologicalOperator Regions, GeneticProtein BindingRepressor ProteinsTranscription, GeneticBiotinbirA protein, E coliCarbon-Nitrogen LigasesDNA, BacterialEscherichia coli ProteinsRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22210766
PMCPMC3294782
OpenAlexW2063662639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.