Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22210149›Full record

SynthesisAgeing research reviews2012

Dietary restriction in rats and mice: a meta-analysis and review of the evidence for genotype-dependent effects on lifespan.

William R Swindell

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Ageing research reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 223 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Changes in the brain [NADFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The cold truth: torpor as a confound in studies of caloric restriction.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. eLife · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

William R SwindellDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States. wswindell@genetics.med.harvard.edu
Harvard University · US

Funding

Network analysis of Signal TransductionR01DK088718 · NIDDK · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PERRIMON, NORBERT · 2010 to 2014
$2.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK088718NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK088718-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory survival experiments have shown that dietary restriction (DR) can increase median and maximum lifespan. This paper provides a meta-analysis of laboratory experiments that have evaluated the effects of DR on lifespan in rats and mice (1934-present). In rats, DR increased median lifespan by 14-45% in half of all experiments, but in mice the effects of DR have been much weaker (4-27%). The least favorable effects of DR on lifespan have been observed among inbred rather than non-inbred mouse strains. In fact, some inbred mouse strains do not necessarily live longer with DR, including DBA/2 male mice and several strains from the ILSXISS recombinant inbred panel. Shortening of lifespan with DR has also been observed and confirmed for ILSXISS strain 114. Importantly, all rodent studies may be biased by the effects of laboratory breeding, since one study has shown that median lifespan is not improved by DR in wild-derived mice. These findings suggest that the set of genetic backgrounds studied in rodent DR experiments should be diversified. This will broaden the scope of genotypes studied in aging research, but may also be critical for translation of findings from rodents to historically outbred and genetically heterogeneous primate species.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionLongevityAge FactorsAnimalsFemaleGenotypeMaleMiceMice, Inbred StrainsPhenotypeRatsSpecies SpecificityTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID22210149
PMCPMC3299887
OpenAlexW2026398820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.