ArticleThe oncologist2012
Bevacizumab in clinical practice: prescribing appropriateness relative to national indications and safety.
Article in The oncologist, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Entero-Cutaneous and Entero-Atmospheric Fistulas: Insights into Management Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Surgical complications of oncological treatments: A narrative review.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Review
- EZH2 inhibition: a promising strategy to prevent cancer immune editing.Epigenomics · 2020Review
- The differences in the assessments of side effects at an oncology outpatient clinic.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2018Article
- Overuse in cancer care: do European studies provide information useful to support policies?Health research policy and systems · 2018Review
- Off-label use of targeted therapies in oncology.World journal of clinical oncology · 2016Review
- Molecular targeting agents associated with transarterial chemoembolization or radiofrequency ablation in hepatocarcinoma treatment.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Targeted therapies in colorectal cancer-an integrative view by PPPM.The EPMA journal · 2013Article
- Angiogenic inhibitors for older patients with advanced colorectal cancer: does the age hold the stage?World journal of gastroenterology · 2013Review
- Trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity in early breast cancer: a cohort study.The oncologist · 2013Article
- Is there such a thing as a cancer treatment that isn't worth its cost?The oncologist · 2012Article
- Influence of the American ODAC statement on Austrian bevacizumab prescribing practice for metastatic breast cancer.The oncologist · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to describe the clinical use of bevacizumab in Lombardy (9.5 million inhabitants), Italy, during 2006-2007 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) to evaluate compliance with the Italian Medicine Agency (AIFA) indications, the incidence of adverse events, and the survival rate. We performed computerized record linkage among three different Lombardy health care databases: File F registry, Regional discharge database, and Registry Office records. Patients were classified into approved and off-label uses according to the AIFA indications. Treatment with bevacizumab was administered to 780 patients, of whom 81.7% (n = 637) had mCRC. Among these, 37.8% (n = 241) of patients received the drug in observance of AIFA indications. Overall, ∼10% of patients had serious treatment-related toxicities (fistula, 3.5%; venous thromboembolism, 2.8%; hemorrhage, 1.9%; intestinal perforation and arterial thromboembolism, <1%). The 1-year survival rate was 74.3% and the 2-year survival rate was 39.2%. The median survival time was 20.5 months, and there were no meaningful differences between gender and age groups. There was a gap between the bevacizumab approved indication and clinical practice pattern: overall, less than one half of the patients received bevacizumab in observance with the regulatory indication. The main reason for nonadherence to the indication was use as a second-line or advanced line of therapy. The incidence of serious adverse events and the survival rates of mCRC patients were similar to those reported in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.