Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22209640›Full record

Trial reportBiological psychiatry2012

The effects of stimulant medication on working memory functional connectivity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Christina G Wong, Michael C Stevens

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Biological psychiatry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Clinical predictors of stimulant efficacy in adults with ADHD.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cognition-enhancing and cognition-impairing doses of psychostimulants exert opposing actions on frontostriatal neural coding of delay in working memory.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Neuropsychological functioning of individuals at clinical evaluation of adult ADHD.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christina G WongOlin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, The Institute of Living/Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut 06106, USA.
Michael C Stevens
Hartford Hospital · US

Funding

Characterizing Two Distinct ADHD Neurobiologies with fMRIR01MH080956 · NIMH · HARTFORD HOSPITAL · PI STEVENS, MICHAEL C · 2008 to 2012
$1.9M
Neuroimaging Cognition in Adolescent Behavior DisordersK23MH070036 · NIMH · HARTFORD HOSPITAL · PI STEVENS, MICHAEL C · 2004 to 2008
$808k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH070036NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorking memory impairments are commonly found in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and often improve with psychostimulant treatment. Little is known about how these medications affect the function of frontoparietal brain regions engaged for working memory. This study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine medication-related changes in brain activation and functional connectivity in ADHD.

methodsEighteen ADHD-combined subtype youths (ages 11-17) twice completed a Sternberg working memory fMRI task in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Medications were individualized as patients' standard, clinically effective psychostimulant (e.g., methylphenidate or dextroamphetamine/amphetamine combination) dose. Brain activity and functional connectivity were characterized using group independent component analysis. SPM5 repeated-measures t tests compared ADHD patients' network engagement and regional functional connectivity on and off medication.

resultsIndependent component analysis identified six frontoparietal networks/components with hemodynamic responses to encoding/maintenance or retrieval phases of the Sternberg fMRI task. On medication, three of these networks significantly increased activation. Functional connectivity analyses found medication led to recruitment of additional brain regions that were not engaged into the networks when participants were on placebo. Also, medication strengthened connectivity of some frontoparietal regions. Many connectivity changes were directly related to improved working memory reaction time. Overall, there was strong evidence for regional functional connectivity changes following medication in structures previously implicated as abnormal in ADHD, such as anterior cingulate, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and precuneus.

conclusionsStimulant medication has widespread effects on the functional connectivity of frontoparietal brain networks, which might be a mechanism that underlies their beneficial effects on working memory performance.

Indexed as

AdolescentAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCentral Nervous System StimulantsChildDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFrontal LobeFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory, Short-TermNeural PathwaysParietal LobePsychomotor PerformanceCentral Nervous System Stimulants

Identifiers

PMID22209640
PMCPMC4120250
OpenAlexW2047928528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.