Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22209496›Full record

ArticleJournal of the neurological sciences2012

Magnetic resonance disease severity scale (MRDSS) for patients with multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study.

Jennifer Moodie, Brian C Healy, Guy J Buckle, Susan A Gauthier, Bonnie I Glanz, Ashish Arora, Antonia Ceccarelli, Shahamat Tauhid, Xue-Mei Han, Arun Venkataraman and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the neurological sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer MoodieDepartment of Neurology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA.
Brian C Healy
Guy J Buckle
Susan A Gauthier
Bonnie I Glanz
Ashish Arora
Antonia Ceccarelli
Shahamat Tauhid
Xue-Mei Han
Arun Venkataraman
Tanuja Chitnis
Samia J Khoury
Charles R G Guttmann
Howard L Weiner
Mohit Neema
Rohit Bakshi
University of Massachusetts Boston · US

Funding

Gray vs. white matter brain atrophy in multiple sclerosisR01NS055083 · NINDS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BAKSHI, ROHIT · 2007 to 2010
$1.5M
NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS055083-01NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS055083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe previously described a composite MRI scale combining T1-lesions, T2-lesions and whole brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis (MS): the magnetic resonance disease severity scale (MRDSS).

objectiveTest strength of the MRDSS vs. individual MRI measures for sensitivity to longitudinal change.

methodsWe studied 84 MS patients over a 3.2±0.3 year follow-up. Baseline and follow-up T2-lesion volume (T2LV), T1-hypointense lesion volume (T1LV), and brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) were measured. MRDSS was the combination of standardized T2LV, T1/T2 ratio and BPF.

resultsPatients had higher MRDSS at follow-up vs. baseline (p<0.001). BPF decreased (p<0.001), T1/T2 increased (p<0.001), and T2LV was unchanged (p>0.5). Change in MRDSS was larger than the change in MRI subcomponents. While MRDSS showed significant change in relapsing-remitting (RR) (p<0.001) and secondary progressive (SP) phenotypes (p<0.05), BPF and T1/T2 ratio changed only in RRMS (p<0.001). Longitudinal change in MRDSS was significantly different between RRMS and SPMS (p=0.0027); however, change in the individual MRI components did not differ. Evaluation with respect to predicting on-study clinical worsening as measured by EDSS revealed a significant association only for T2LV (p=0.038).

conclusionResults suggest improved sensitivity of MRDSS to longitudinal change vs. individual MRI measures. MRDSS has particularly high sensitivity in RRMS.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingSeverity of Illness IndexAdultCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisProspective StudiesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID22209496
PMCPMC3319060
OpenAlexW2158889501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.