Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22207836›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2011

Virally mediated gene manipulation in the adult CNS.

Efrat Edry, Raphael Lamprecht, Shlomo Wagner, Kobi Rosenblum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Neuroepigenetic Editing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Recent advances in neuroepigenetic editing.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2019
    Review
  5. Neuroepigenetic Editing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018
    Review
  6. Developing therapies for spinal muscular atrophy.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2016
    Review
  7. Genetic or pharmacological reduction of PERK enhances cortical-dependent taste learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  8. Memory of conditioned taste aversion is erased by inhibition of PI3K in the insular cortex.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Efrat EdryDepartment of Neurobiology and Ethology, Center for Gene Manipulation in the Brain (CGMB), University of Haifa Haifa, Israel.
Raphael Lamprecht
Shlomo Wagner
Kobi Rosenblum

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how the CNS functions poses one of the greatest challenges in modern life science and medicine. Studying the brain is especially challenging because of its complexity, the heterogeneity of its cellular composition, and the substantial changes it undergoes throughout its life-span. The complexity of adult brain neural networks results also from the diversity of properties and functions of neuronal cells, governed, inter alia, by temporally and spatially differential expression of proteins in mammalian brain cell populations. Hence, research into the biology of CNS activity and its implications to human and animal behavior must use novel scientific tools. One source of such tools is the field of molecular genetics-recently utilized more and more frequently in neuroscience research. Transgenic approaches in general, and gene targeting in rodents have become fundamental tools for elucidating gene function in the CNS. Although spectacular progress has been achieved over recent decades by using these approaches, it is important to note that they face a number of restrictions. One of the main challenges is presented by the temporal and spatial regulation of introduced genetic manipulations. Viral vectors provide an alternative approach to temporally regulated, localized delivery of genetic modifications into neurons. In this review we describe available technologies for gene transfer into the adult mammalian CNS that use both viral and non-viral tools. We discuss viral vectors frequently used in neuroscience, with emphasis on lentiviral vector (LV) systems. We consider adverse effects of LVs, and the use of LVs for temporally and spatially controllable manipulations. Especially, we highlight the significance of viral vector-mediated genetic manipulations in studying learning and memory processes, and how they may be effectively used to separate out the various phases of learning: acquisition, consolidation, retrieval, and maintenance.

Indexed as

gene regulationlearning and memorylentivirus (LV)viral vectors

Identifiers

PMID22207836
PMCPMC3245970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.