ArticleZooKeys2011
XML schemas and mark-up practices of taxonomic literature.
Article in ZooKeys, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Infrastructure and Population of the OpenBiodiv Biodiversity Knowledge Graph.Biodiversity data journal · 2021Article
- The Taxon Hypothesis Paradigm-On the Unambiguous Detection and Communication of Taxa.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Mining data from legacy taxonomic literature and application for sampling spiders of the Teutamus group (Araneae; Liocranidae) in Southeast Asia.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Digitising legacy zoological taxonomic literature: Processes, products and using the output.ZooKeys · 2016Article
- ZooKeys 500: traditions and innovations hand-in-hand servicing our taxonomic community.ZooKeys · 2015Article
- Type material in the NCBI Taxonomy Database.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Corrected data re-harvested: curating literature in the era of networked biodiversity informatics.Biodiversity data journal · 2015Article
- Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature.Biodiversity data journal · 2015Article
- Article
- From text to structured data: Converting a word-processed floristic checklist into Darwin Core Archive format.PhytoKeys · 2012Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We review the three most widely used XML schemas used to mark-up taxonomic texts, TaxonX, TaxPub and taXMLit. These are described from the viewpoint of their development history, current status, implementation, and use cases. The concept of "taxon treatment" from the viewpoint of taxonomy mark-up into XML is discussed. TaxonX and taXMLit are primarily designed for legacy literature, the former being more lightweight and with a focus on recovery of taxon treatments, the latter providing a much more detailed set of tags to facilitate data extraction and analysis. TaxPub is an extension of the National Library of Medicine Document Type Definition (NLM DTD) for taxonomy focussed on layout and recovery and, as such, is best suited for mark-up of new publications and their archiving in PubMedCentral. All three schemas have their advantages and shortcomings and can be used for different purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.