ArticleZooKeys2011
Biodiversity information platforms: From standards to interoperability.
Article in ZooKeys, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experiences from national biodiversity data infrastructures in Europe: advancing data integration and community engagement.Bioscience · 2026Article
- Assessing coverage of the monitoring framework of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and opportunities to fill gaps.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- National biodiversity data infrastructures: ten essential functions for science, policy, and practice.Bioscience · 2025Article
- AI Naturalists Might Hold the Key to Unlocking Biodiversity Data in Social Media Imagery.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Edaphostat: interactive ecological analysis of soil organism occurrences and preferences from the Edaphobase data warehouse.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2017Article
- The Corvids Literature Database--500 years of ornithological research from a crow's perspective.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Article
- Article
- Introduction to the Greek Taxon Information System (GTIS) in LifeWatchGreece: the construction of the Preliminary Checklists of Species of Greece.Biodiversity data journal · 2016Article
- Article
- Article
- Sample data processing in an additive and reproducible taxonomic workflow by using character data persistently linked to preserved individual specimens.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2015Review
- A semi-automated workflow for biodiversity data retrieval, cleaning, and quality control.Biodiversity data journal · 2014Article
- Article
- Fauna Europaea - all European animal species on the web.Biodiversity data journal · 2014Article
- Enriched biodiversity data as a resource and service.Biodiversity data journal · 2014Article
- Creative Commons licenses and the non-commercial condition: Implications for the re-use of biodiversity information.ZooKeys · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the most serious bottlenecks in the scientific workflows of biodiversity sciences is the need to integrate data from different sources, software applications, and services for analysis, visualisation and publication. For more than a quarter of a century the TDWG Biodiversity Information Standards organisation has a central role in defining and promoting data standards and protocols supporting interoperability between disparate and locally distributed systems.Although often not sufficiently recognized, TDWG standards are the foundation of many popular Biodiversity Informatics applications and infrastructures ranging from small desktop software solutions to large scale international data networks. However, individual scientists and groups of collaborating scientist have difficulties in fully exploiting the potential of standards that are often notoriously complex, lack non-technical documentations, and use different representations and underlying technologies. In the last few years, a series of initiatives such as Scratchpads, the EDIT Platform for Cybertaxonomy, and biowikifarm have started to implement and set up virtual work platforms for biodiversity sciences which shield their users from the complexity of the underlying standards. Apart from being practical work-horses for numerous working processes related to biodiversity sciences, they can be seen as information brokers mediating information between multiple data standards and protocols.The ViBRANT project will further strengthen the flexibility and power of virtual biodiversity working platforms by building software interfaces between them, thus facilitating essential information flows needed for comprehensive data exchange, data indexing, web-publication, and versioning. This work will make an important contribution to the shaping of an international, interoperable, and user-oriented biodiversity information infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.