Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22207567›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2012

Oral adverse events associated with tyrosine kinase and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma: a structured literature review.

Christine B Boers-Doets, Joel B Epstein, Judith E Raber-Durlacher, Jan Ouwerkerk, Richard M Logan, Jan A Brakenhoff, Mario E Lacouture, Hans Gelderblom

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Dental treatment needs in hospitalized cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Current Trends in Management of Oral Mucositis in Cancer TreatmentAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2017
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Oral mucosal changes induced by anticancer targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Management of Dermatologic Toxicities Associated With Targeted Therapy.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Christine B Boers-DoetsOncology Clinical Trials Office Waterland Hospital, Oncology Clinical Trials Office, P.O. Box 250, 1440 AG Purmerend, The Netherlands. CBoers@wlz.nl
Joel B Epstein
Judith E Raber-Durlacher
Jan Ouwerkerk
Richard M Logan
Jan A Brakenhoff
Mario E Lacouture
Hans Gelderblom
Leiden University Medical Center · NLWaterlandziekenhuis · NLIllinois College · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral adverse events (OAEs) associated with multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORIs) are underestimated but frequent and novel presentations of mucosal manifestations. Because optimal antitumor activity requires maintaining the optimal dose, it is essential to avoid unintended treatment delays or interruptions.

methodsWe review the reported prevalence and appearance of OAEs with TKIs and mTORIs and the current oral assessment tools commonly used in clinical trials. We discuss the correlations between OAEs and hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) and rash.

resultsThe reported prevalence of oral mucositis/stomatitis of any grade is 4% for pazopanib, 28% for sorafenib, 38% for sunitinib, 41% for temsirolimus, and 44% for everolimus. Oral lesions associated with these agents have been reported to more closely resemble aphthous stomatitis than OM caused by conventional agents. In addition, these agents may result in symptoms such as oral mucosal pain, dysgeusia, and dysphagia, in the absence of clinical lesions. Because of these factors, OAEs secondary to targeted agents may be underreported. In addition, a correlation between OAEs and HFSR was identified.

conclusionsOAEs caused by TKIs and mTORIs may represent dose-limiting toxicities, especially considering the fact that even low grades of OAEs may be troubling to the patient. We discuss how these novel AEs can be assessed because current mucositis assessment tools have limitations. Prospective studies investigating the pathogenesis, risk factors, and management of OAEs are needed in order to minimize the impact on patient's health-related quality of life.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Renal CellHumansKidney NeoplasmsMucositisProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesStomatitisTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesAntineoplastic AgentsMTOR protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID22207567
PMCPMC3267813
OpenAlexW2111743784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.