ArticlePloS one2011
Multiple analytical approaches reveal distinct gene-environment interactions in smokers and non smokers in lung cancer.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between Smokeless Tobacco Use and Waterpipe Smoking and the Risk of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Epidemiological Evidence.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2022Pooled it
- A comprehensive meta-analysis and a case-control study give insights into genetic susceptibility of lung cancer and subgroups.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Relationship between type of smokeless tobacco & risk of cancer: A systematic review.The Indian journal of medical research · 2018Pooled it
- Quantitative assessment of the influence of EPHX1 gene polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis with 94,213 subjects.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2014Pooled it
- GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism is associated with lung cancer risk among Asian population and smokers: an updated meta-analysis.Molecular biology reports · 2014Pooled it
- Sulfotransferase SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism with cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 53 case-control studies.PloS one · 2014Pooled it
- Association between microsomal epoxide hydrolase 1 T113C polymorphism and susceptibility to lung cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013Pooled it
- Association of glutathione S-transferase P1 gene polymorphism with the histological types of lung cancer: a meta-analysis.Molecular biology reports · 2013Pooled it
- EPHX1 A139G polymorphism and lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013Pooled it
- Association between the STK15 F31I polymorphism and cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis involving 43,626 subjects.PloS one · 2013Pooled it
- Association of glutathione S-transferase P1 gene polymorphism with the susceptibility of lung cancer.Molecular biology reports · 2012Pooled it
- Identifying polymorphic cis-regulatory variants as risk markers for lung carcinogenesis and chemotherapy responses in tobacco smokers from eastern India.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Why We Will Continue to Lose Our Battle with Cancers If We Do Not Stop Their Triggers from Environmental Pollution.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Glutathione S-Transferase P1 313 (A > G) Ile105Val Polymorphism Contributes to Cancer Susceptibility in Indian Population: A Meta-analysis of 39 Case-Control Studies.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2020Article
- Genetic Polymorphisms of Xenobiotic Metabolizing Genes (GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1), Gene-Gene Interaction with Association to Lung Cancer Risk in North India; A Case Control Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2019Article
- Metabolic Phase I (CYPs) and Phase II (GSTs) Gene Polymorphisms and Their Interaction with Environmental Factors in Nasopharyngeal Cancer from the Ethnic Population of Northeast India.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2019Article
- Differential Effect of Smoking on Gene Expression in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Impact of risk factors on functional status in maintenance hemodialysis patients.European journal of medical research · 2017Article
- On meta- and mega-analyses for gene-environment interactions.Genetic epidemiology · 2017Article
- Transdisciplinary approaches enhance the production of translational knowledge.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complex disease such as cancer results from interactions of multiple genetic and environmental factors. Studying these factors singularly cannot explain the underlying pathogenetic mechanism of the disease. Multi-analytical approach, including logistic regression (LR), classification and regression tree (CART) and multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR), was applied in 188 lung cancer cases and 290 controls to explore high order interactions among xenobiotic metabolizing genes and environmental risk factors. Smoking was identified as the predominant risk factor by all three analytical approaches. Individually, CYP1A1*2A polymorphism was significantly associated with increased lung cancer risk (OR = 1.69;95%CI = 1.11-2.59,p = 0.01), whereas EPHX1 Tyr113His and SULT1A1 Arg213His conferred reduced risk (OR = 0.40;95%CI = 0.25-0.65,p<0.001 and OR = 0.51;95%CI = 0.33-0.78,p = 0.002 respectively). In smokers, EPHX1 Tyr113His and SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphisms reduced the risk of lung cancer, whereas CYP1A1*2A, CYP1A1*2C and GSTP1 Ile105Val imparted increased risk in non-smokers only. While exploring non-linear interactions through CART analysis, smokers carrying the combination of EPHX1 113TC (Tyr/His), SULT1A1 213GG (Arg/Arg) or AA (His/His) and GSTM1 null genotypes showed the highest risk for lung cancer (OR = 3.73;95%CI = 1.33-10.55,p = 0.006), whereas combined effect of CYP1A1*2A 6235CC or TC, SULT1A1 213GG (Arg/Arg) and betel quid chewing showed maximum risk in non-smokers (OR = 2.93;95%CI = 1.15-7.51,p = 0.01). MDR analysis identified two distinct predictor models for the risk of lung cancer in smokers (tobacco chewing, EPHX1 Tyr113His, and SULT1A1 Arg213His) and non-smokers (CYP1A1*2A, GSTP1 Ile105Val and SULT1A1 Arg213His) with testing balance accuracy (TBA) of 0.6436 and 0.6677 respectively. Interaction entropy interpretations of MDR results showed non-additive interactions of tobacco chewing with SULT1A1 Arg213His and EPHX1 Tyr113His in smokers and SULT1A1 Arg213His with GSTP1 Ile105Val and CYP1A1*2C in nonsmokers. These results identified distinct gene-gene and gene environment interactions in smokers and non-smokers, which confirms the importance of multifactorial interaction in risk assessment of lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.