Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22205930›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2011

Safety and reactogenicity of canarypox ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521) and HIV-1 gp120 AIDSVAX B/E vaccination in an efficacy trial in Thailand.

Punnee Pitisuttithum, Supachai Rerks-Ngarm, Valai Bussaratid, Jittima Dhitavat, Wirach Maekanantawat, Swangjai Pungpak, Pravan Suntharasamai, Sirivan Vanijanonta, Sorachai Nitayapan, Jaranit Kaewkungwal and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Virus-based nanoparticles as platform technologies for modern vaccines.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Punnee PitisuttithumFaculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. tmppt@mahidol.ac.th
Supachai Rerks-Ngarm
Valai Bussaratid
Jittima Dhitavat
Wirach Maekanantawat
Swangjai Pungpak
Pravan Suntharasamai
Sirivan Vanijanonta
Sorachai Nitayapan
Jaranit Kaewkungwal
Michael Benenson
Patricia Morgan
Robert J O'Connell
Jeffrey Berenberg
Sanjay Gurunathan
Donald P Francis
Robert Paris
Joseph Chiu
Donald Stablein
Nelson L Michael
Jean-Louis Excler
Merlin L Robb
Jerome H Kim
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research · USMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit · THArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science · THMahidol University · THEmmes (United States) · USGlobal Solutions for Infectious Diseases · USMinistry of Public Health · THNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USSanofi (United States) · USTripler Army Medical Center · US

Funding

FILARIASIS REPOSITORY RESEARCH SERVICEN01AI002642 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA (UGA) · PI MC CALL, JOHN W · 1985 to 1987
–
NIAID NIH HHS Y1-AI-2642-12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA prime-boost vaccination regimen with ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521) administered intramuscularly at 0, 4, 12, and 24 weeks and gp120 AIDSVAX B/E at 12 and 24 weeks demonstrated modest efficacy of 31.2% for prevention of HIV acquisition in HIV-uninfected adults participating in a community-based efficacy trial in Thailand. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsReactogenicity was recorded for 3 days following vaccination. Adverse events were monitored every 6 months for 3.5 years, during which pregnancy outcomes were recorded. Of the 16,402 volunteers, 69% of the participants reported an adverse event any time after the first dose. Only 32.9% experienced an AE within 30 days following any vaccination. Overall adverse event rates and attribution of relatedness did not differ between groups. The frequency of serious adverse events was similar in vaccine (14.3%) and placebo (14.9%) recipients (p = 0.33). None of the 160 deaths (85 in vaccine and 75 in placebo recipients, p = 0.43) was assessed as related to vaccine. The most common cause of death was trauma or traffic accident. Approximately 30% of female participants reported a pregnancy during the study. Abnormal pregnancy outcomes were experienced in 17.1% of vaccine and 14.6% (p = 0.13) of placebo recipients. When the conception occurred within 3 months (estimated) of a vaccination, the majority of these abnormal outcomes were spontaneous or elective abortions among 22.2% and 15.3% of vaccine and placebo pregnant recipients, respectively (p = 0.08). Local reactions occurred in 88.0% of vaccine and 61.0% of placebo recipients (p<0.001) and were more frequent after ALVAC-HIV than AIDSVAX B/E vaccination. Systemic reactions were more frequent in vaccine than placebo recipients (77.2% vs. 59.8%, p<0.001). Local and systemic reactions were mostly mild to moderate, resolving within 3 days. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The ALVAC-HIV and AIDSVAX B/E vaccine regimen was found to be safe, well tolerated and suitable for potential large-scale use in Thailand.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.govNCT00223080.

Indexed as

SafetyAdolescentAdultAIDS VaccinesFemaleHIV-1HIV Envelope Protein gp120HumansImmunization, SecondaryMalePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeThailandVaccinationYoung AdultAIDS Vaccinesgp120 protein, Human immunodeficiency virus 1HIV Envelope Protein gp120

Identifiers

PMID22205930
PMCPMC3244387
OpenAlexW1977786472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.