Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22205659›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2012

Anti-Toxoplasma antibody prevalence, primary infection rate, and risk factors in a study of toxoplasmosis in 4,466 pregnant women in Japan.

Makiko Sakikawa, Shunichi Noda, Masachi Hanaoka, Hirotoshi Nakayama, Satoshi Hojo, Shigeko Kakinoki, Maki Nakata, Takashi Yasuda, Tsuyomu Ikenoue, Toshiyuki Kojima

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Epidemiology and infection · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Importance of Use of the On-line Databases as a Source for Systematic Review of Toxoplasmosis Screening During Pregnancy.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2021
    Review
  13. A contemporary insight into the sero-epidemiology ofNepal journal of epidemiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Seroprevalence of humanJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Makiko SakikawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. sakikawa-tky@umin.ac.jp
Shunichi Noda
Masachi Hanaoka
Hirotoshi Nakayama
Satoshi Hojo
Shigeko Kakinoki
Maki Nakata
Takashi Yasuda
Tsuyomu Ikenoue
Toshiyuki Kojima
Memorial Hospital of South Bend · USUniversity of Miyazaki · JPMitsui Memorial Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxoplasmosis is a zoonosis caused by infection with Toxoplasma gondii and is prevalent worldwide under various climatic conditions. It is usually asymptomatic, but infection in pregnant women can pose serious health problems for the fetus. However, epidemiological information regarding toxoplasmosis in Japanese pregnant women is limited. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of anti-Toxoplasma antibodies, the primary infection rate, and the risk factors for toxoplasmosis in Japanese pregnant women. We measured anti-Toxoplasma antibody titers in 4,466 pregnant women over a period of 7.5 years and simultaneously conducted interviews to identify the risk factors for toxoplasmosis. The overall prevalence of anti-Toxoplasma antibodies was 10.3%, and it was significantly higher in women aged above 35 years. The rate of primary Toxoplasma infection during pregnancy was estimated to be 0.25%. A possibility of infection in the later stages of pregnancy was identified for those women who were not infected in the early stages. A history of raw meat intake was identified to be a risk factor related to toxoplasmosis. Therefore, to lower the risk of toxoplasmosis, pregnant women should refrain from eating raw and undercooked meat and maintain personal hygiene.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntibodies, ProtozoanFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicJapanMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPregnant PeopleRisk FactorsSeroepidemiologic StudiesToxoplasmaToxoplasmosisAntibodies, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID22205659
PMCPMC3294603
OpenAlexW2120660237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.